DJAN vs DYLG

DJAN vs DYLG

Which is better, DJAN or DYLG?

DYLG has been ahead.

DYLG has a lower expense ratio. DYLG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: DYLGHigher Returns: DYLG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDJANDYLG
Expense Ratio0.85%0.35%Best
AUM$455M$5M
Dividend Yield0.00%9.33%
Holdings1066
YTD Return+8.08%+9.07%Best
1Y Return+11.52%+14.74%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+12.59%+14.53%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+7.96%-
Volatility (annualized)6.2%Best9.4%
Max Drawdown-9.3%Best-14.2%
$10,000 over 3.2 years$14,183$14,574Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Global X by mirae Asset
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionJan 15, 2021Jul 25, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 26, 2023 to Oct 15, 2026 (3.2 years).

DJAN vs DYLG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.

Compare DJAN against instead:DJAN vs SPYDJAN vs QQQDJAN vs VOODJAN vs VTIDYLG against:DYLG vs VXUS

DJAN vs DYLG Performance

FT Vest US Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year DJAN returned +11.52% while DYLG returned +14.74%. Year to date, DJAN is up 8.08% versus a gain of 9.07% for DYLG.

Over three years, DJAN compounded at +12.59% per year against +14.53% for DYLG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

DYLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.4% compared with 6.2% for DJAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.3% for DJAN and -14.2% for DYLG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DJAN charges 0.85% per year while DYLG charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $35 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DJAN currently yields 0.00% against 9.33% for DYLG.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of DJAN and DYLG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

DJANDYLG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DJAN or DYLG?

DJAN has an expense ratio of 0.85% while DYLG charges 0.35%. DYLG is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, DJAN or DYLG?

Over the past year DJAN returned +11.52% vs +14.74% for DYLG, so DYLG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, DJAN or DYLG?

DYLG has been the more volatile fund at 9.4% annualized versus 6.2% for DJAN. Worst drawdown: DJAN -9.3% vs DYLG -14.2%.

Should I hold both DJAN and DYLG?

DJAN and DYLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, DJAN or DYLG?

DJAN yields 0.00% while DYLG yields 9.33%, so DYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is DYLG better than DJAN?

DYLG has a lower expense ratio. DYLG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.