DJUN vs NOVM

DJUN vs NOVM

Which is better, DJUN or NOVM?

DJUN has been ahead.

DJUN led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: DJUN

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDJUNNOVM
Expense Ratio0.85%Tie0.85%Tie
AUM$370M$27M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1010
YTD Return+6.22%Best+4.49%
1Y Return+8.37%Best+6.65%
3Y Return (annualized)+11.96%-
5Y Return (annualized)+8.21%-
Volatility (annualized)6.2%2.6%Best
Max Drawdown-12.0%-3.3%Best
$10,000 over 1.9 years$11,656Best$11,263
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionJun 19, 2020Nov 15, 2024

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).

DJUN vs NOVM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.

Compare DJUN against instead:DJUN vs SPYDJUN vs QQQDJUN vs VOODJUN vs VTINOVM against:NOVM vs VXUS

DJUN vs NOVM Performance

FT Vest US Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Max Buffer ETF - November (NOVM) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year DJUN returned +8.37% while NOVM returned +6.65%. Year to date, DJUN is up 6.22% versus a gain of 4.49% for NOVM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

DJUN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.2% compared with 2.6% for NOVM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.0% for DJUN and -3.3% for NOVM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DJUN charges 0.85% per year while NOVM charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, DJUN currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for NOVM.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of DJUN and NOVM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

DJUNNOVM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DJUN or NOVM?

DJUN has an expense ratio of 0.85% while NOVM charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, DJUN or NOVM?

Over the past year DJUN returned +8.37% vs +6.65% for NOVM, so DJUN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), DJUN annualized +8.40% vs +6.46% for NOVM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, DJUN or NOVM?

DJUN has been the more volatile fund at 6.2% annualized versus 2.6% for NOVM. Worst drawdown: DJUN -12.0% vs NOVM -3.3%.

Should I hold both DJUN and NOVM?

DJUN and NOVM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, DJUN or NOVM?

DJUN yields 0.00% while NOVM yields 0.00%, so NOVM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is NOVM better than DJUN?

DJUN led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.