DLLL vs VTI

DLLL vs VTI

Which is better, DLLL or VTI?

Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. DLLL led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: DLLL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDLLLVTI
Expense Ratio1.50%0.03%Best
AUM$218M$689.2B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings43,524
YTD Return+862.15%Best+13.02%
1Y Return+572.86%Best+16.63%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.97%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.99%
Volatility (annualized)214.7%12.8%Best
Max Drawdown-68.6%-19.3%Best
$10,000 over 1.7 years$99,742Best$12,812
Fund FamilyGraniteSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleOption WritingLarge Cap Blend
InceptionFeb 13, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 13, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.7 years).

DLLL vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

DLLL vs VTI Performance

GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DLLL returned +572.86% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, DLLL is up 862.15% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

DLLL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 214.7% compared with 12.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.6% for DLLL and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DLLL charges 1.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DLLL currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of DLLL and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

DLLLVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DLLL or VTI?

DLLL has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $147 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, DLLL or VTI?

Over the past year DLLL returned +572.86% vs +16.63% for VTI, so DLLL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), DLLL annualized +286.88% vs +15.69% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, DLLL or VTI?

DLLL has been the more volatile fund at 214.7% annualized versus 12.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DLLL -68.6% vs VTI -19.3%.

Should I hold both DLLL and VTI?

DLLL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, DLLL or VTI?

DLLL yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than DLLL?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. DLLL led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.