DOCT vs HEDG
FT Vest US Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October vs Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF
Which is better, DOCT or HEDG?
DOCT has been ahead.
DOCT has a lower expense ratio. DOCT led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DOCT | HEDG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85%Best | 0.96% |
| AUM | $402M | $465M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.78% |
| Holdings | 10 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +8.89%Best | +6.78% |
| 1Y Return | +11.21%Best | +10.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.88% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.29% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.0% | 3.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -4.3% | -3.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $11,111Best | $11,015 |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Equable Shares |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Oct 16, 2020 | Oct 13, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 13, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1 years).
DOCT vs HEDG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
DOCT vs HEDG Performance
FT Vest US Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October (DOCT) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF (HEDG) is an ETF from Equable Shares. Over the past year DOCT returned +11.21% while HEDG returned +10.34%. Year to date, DOCT is up 8.89% versus a gain of 6.78% for HEDG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DOCT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.0% compared with 3.6% for HEDG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.3% for DOCT and -3.9% for HEDG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DOCT charges 0.85% per year while HEDG charges 0.96%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $96 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DOCT currently yields 0.00% against 2.78% for HEDG.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DOCT and HEDG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DOCT or HEDG?
DOCT has an expense ratio of 0.85% while HEDG charges 0.96%. DOCT is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DOCT or HEDG?
Over the past year DOCT returned +11.21% vs +10.34% for HEDG, so DOCT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), DOCT annualized +11.11% vs +10.15% for HEDG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DOCT or HEDG?
DOCT has been the more volatile fund at 6.0% annualized versus 3.6% for HEDG. Worst drawdown: DOCT -4.3% vs HEDG -3.9%.
Should I hold both DOCT and HEDG?
DOCT and HEDG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DOCT or HEDG?
DOCT yields 0.00% while HEDG yields 2.78%, so HEDG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HEDG better than DOCT?
DOCT has a lower expense ratio. DOCT led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.