DOCT vs UXJL

DOCT vs UXJL

Which is better, DOCT or UXJL?

UXJL has been ahead.

UXJL led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: UXJL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDOCTUXJL
Expense Ratio0.85%Tie0.85%Tie
AUM$402M$6M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings108
YTD Return+8.89%+13.31%Best
1Y Return+11.21%+16.73%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+10.88%-
5Y Return (annualized)+8.29%-
Volatility (annualized)5.5%Best13.8%
Max Drawdown-4.3%Best-10.3%
$10,000 over 1.2 years$11,577$12,315Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionOct 16, 2020Jul 18, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 21, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.2 years).

DOCT vs UXJL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.

Compare DOCT against instead:DOCT vs SPYDOCT vs QQQDOCT vs VOODOCT vs VTIUXJL against:UXJL vs VXUS

DOCT vs UXJL Performance

FT Vest US Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October (DOCT) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year DOCT returned +11.21% while UXJL returned +16.73%. Year to date, DOCT is up 8.89% versus a gain of 13.31% for UXJL.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

UXJL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.8% compared with 5.5% for DOCT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.3% for DOCT and -10.3% for UXJL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DOCT charges 0.85% per year while UXJL charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, DOCT currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for UXJL.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of DOCT and UXJL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

DOCTUXJL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DOCT or UXJL?

DOCT has an expense ratio of 0.85% while UXJL charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, DOCT or UXJL?

Over the past year DOCT returned +11.21% vs +16.73% for UXJL, so UXJL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), DOCT annualized +12.98% vs +18.95% for UXJL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, DOCT or UXJL?

UXJL has been the more volatile fund at 13.8% annualized versus 5.5% for DOCT. Worst drawdown: DOCT -4.3% vs UXJL -10.3%.

Should I hold both DOCT and UXJL?

DOCT and UXJL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, DOCT or UXJL?

DOCT yields 0.00% while UXJL yields 0.00%, so UXJL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is UXJL better than DOCT?

UXJL led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.