DSCO vs JHCP
DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF vs John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF
Which is better, DSCO or JHCP?
DSCO has been ahead.
JHCP has a lower expense ratio. DSCO led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DSCO | JHCP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.36%Best |
| AUM | $244M | $340M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.28% | 4.62% |
| Holdings | 355 | 987 |
| YTD Return | +0.24%Best | -2.37% |
| 1Y Return | - | -2.10% |
| Fund Family | DoubleLine Funds | John Hancock Investment Management |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | Investment Grade Bond | Investment Grade Bond |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2026 | Dec 18, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
DSCO vs JHCP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DSCO vs JHCP Performance
DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF (DSCO) is an ETF from DoubleLine Funds and John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF (JHCP) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management. Year to date, DSCO is up 0.24% versus a loss of 2.37% for JHCP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DSCO charges 0.50% per year while JHCP charges 0.36%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $36 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DSCO currently yields 3.28% against 4.62% for JHCP.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 55 holdings in DSCO and 436 in JHCP, totalling 16.6% and 40.1% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 2 positions appear in both.
2 positions in common, counted across the 55 positions we hold weights for in DSCO and 436 in JHCP, against full books of 355 and 987.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DSCO | Weight in JHCP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HY 2025-SPRL AHudson Yards 2025-Sprl Mortgag Hy 2025 Sprl A 144A | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.07% |
| ZAXBY 2021-1A A2Zaxby'S Funding Llc, Series 2021-1A, Class A2 | 0.12% | 0.09% | 0.03% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DSCO and JHCP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DSCO or JHCP?
DSCO has an expense ratio of 0.50% while JHCP charges 0.36%. JHCP is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, DSCO or JHCP?
DSCO yields 3.28% while JHCP yields 4.62%, so JHCP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JHCP better than DSCO?
JHCP has a lower expense ratio. DSCO led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.