DSCO vs MFSB
DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF vs MFS Active Core Plus Bond ETF
Which is better, DSCO or MFSB?
DSCO has been ahead.
MFSB has a lower expense ratio. DSCO led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DSCO | MFSB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.34%Best |
| AUM | $244M | $614M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.28% | 4.82% |
| Holdings | 355 | 470 |
| YTD Return | +0.24%Best | -1.56% |
| 1Y Return | - | -1.36% |
| Fund Family | DoubleLine Funds | MFS Investment Management |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | Investment Grade Bond | Investment Grade Bond |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2026 | Dec 5, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
DSCO vs MFSB growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DSCO vs MFSB Performance
DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF (DSCO) is an ETF from DoubleLine Funds and MFS Active Core Plus Bond ETF (MFSB) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management. Year to date, DSCO is up 0.24% versus a loss of 1.56% for MFSB.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DSCO charges 0.50% per year while MFSB charges 0.34%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $34 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DSCO currently yields 3.28% against 4.82% for MFSB.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 55 holdings in DSCO and 180 in MFSB, totalling 16.6% and 42.2% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 2 positions appear in both.
2 positions in common, counted across the 55 positions we hold weights for in DSCO and 180 in MFSB, against full books of 355 and 470.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DSCO | Weight in MFSB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMP 2024-MF23 BBmp 2024-Mf23 Tsfr1M+174.142 06/15/2041 144A % 06/15/2041 | 0.16% | 0.04% | 0.12% |
| ARCLO 2022-FL1 AArclo 2022-Fl1 A | 0.03% | 0.01% | 0.02% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DSCO and MFSB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DSCO or MFSB?
DSCO has an expense ratio of 0.50% while MFSB charges 0.34%. MFSB is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, DSCO or MFSB?
DSCO yields 3.28% while MFSB yields 4.82%, so MFSB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MFSB better than DSCO?
MFSB has a lower expense ratio. DSCO led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.