DSTL vs VTI

DSTL vs VTI

Which is better, DSTL or VTI?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DSTL is less concentrated, with 19.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTILess Concentrated: DSTL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDSTLVTI
Expense Ratio0.39%0.03%Best
AUM$2.0B$690.1B
Dividend Yield1.06%1.03%
Holdings3003,524
YTD Return+12.75%+14.35%Best
1Y Return+16.90%+17.97%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+14.85%+22.47%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+11.23%+12.62%Best
Volatility (annualized)17.3%17.1%Best
Max Drawdown-33.1%Best-35.0%
$10,000 over 5 years$17,026$18,117Best
Top 10 Weight19.9%Best33.3%
Fund FamilyDistillate Capital EtfsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 23, 2018May 24, 2001

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2018 to Oct 13, 2026 (8 years).

DSTL vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.

DSTL vs VTI Performance

Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) is an ETF from Distillate Capital Etfs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DSTL returned +16.90% while VTI returned +17.97%. Year to date, DSTL is up 12.75% versus a gain of 14.35% for VTI.

Over three years, DSTL compounded at +14.85% per year against +22.47% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.23% and +12.62% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +14.99% annualized vs +14.32%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

DSTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 17.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.1% for DSTL and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DSTL charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DSTL currently yields 1.06% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

DSTL already in VTI97.8%
VTI already in DSTL6.8%

97.8% of DSTL's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 6.8% of VTI's money is in holdings DSTL also owns.

Most of DSTL is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, DSTL as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

96 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in DSTL and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 300 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,055 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for DSTL (90.7% of the fund), and 3 for DSTL that do not appear in VTI (2.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in DSTLWeight in VTIDifference
CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity3.17%0.20%2.97%
MRKMerck & Company Inc2.62%0.45%2.17%
ACNAccenture Plc2.36%0.14%2.22%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.1.86%0.61%1.25%
MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp2.02%0.13%1.89%
CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa1.96%0.12%1.84%
UBERUber Technologies Inc1.59%0.20%1.39%
ADBEAdobe Systems1.49%0.14%1.35%
UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated1.09%0.52%0.57%
BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc.1.37%0.21%1.16%

97.8% of DSTL is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

DSTLVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DSTL or VTI?

DSTL has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, DSTL or VTI?

Over the past year DSTL returned +16.90% vs +17.97% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), DSTL annualized +14.32% vs +14.99% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, DSTL or VTI?

DSTL has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 17.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DSTL -33.1% vs VTI -35.0%.

Should I hold both DSTL and VTI?

DSTL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between DSTL and VTI?

97.8% of DSTL's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 6.8% of VTI's is in holdings DSTL also owns. They hold 96 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in DSTL and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, DSTL or VTI?

DSTL yields 1.06% while VTI yields 1.03%, so DSTL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than DSTL?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DSTL is less concentrated, with 19.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.