DUHP vs JQUA
Dimensional US High Profitability ETF vs JPMorgan US Quality Factor ETF
Which is better, DUHP or JQUA?
Nearly the same fund. JQUA costs less.
JQUA has a lower expense ratio. JQUA led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. JQUA is less concentrated, with 19.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DUHP | JQUA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.21% | 0.12%Best |
| AUM | $19.7B | $9.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.85% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 160 | 624 |
| YTD Return | +11.84% | +19.98%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.34% | +21.86%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.51% | +20.91%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.77% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.1% | -19.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $17,884 | $19,621Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.3% | 19.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 23, 2022 | Nov 8, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.6 years).
DUHP vs JQUA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
DUHP vs JQUA Performance
Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) is an ETF from Dimensional and JPMorgan US Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year DUHP returned +13.34% while JQUA returned +21.86%. Year to date, DUHP is up 11.84% versus a gain of 19.98% for JQUA.
Over three years, DUHP compounded at +18.51% per year against +20.91% for JQUA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DUHP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.3% for JQUA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.1% for DUHP and -19.1% for JQUA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DUHP charges 0.21% per year while JQUA charges 0.12%. On a $10,000 position that is $21 vs $12 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DUHP currently yields 0.85% against 1.08% for JQUA.
Holdings Overlap
74.2% of DUHP's money is in holdings JQUA also owns. 43.8% of JQUA's money is in holdings DUHP also owns.
Most of DUHP is already inside JQUA. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
89 positions in common, counted across the 158 positions we hold weights for in DUHP and 306 in JQUA, against full books of 160 and 624.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 207 positions for JQUA that do not appear in our book for DUHP (54.8% of the fund), and 62 for DUHP that do not appear in JQUA (25.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DUHP | Weight in JQUA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.90% | 2.00% | 5.90% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.41% | 2.06% | 5.35% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.90% | 2.05% | 2.85% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.32% | 2.10% | 2.22% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.25% | 2.16% | 2.09% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.18% | 1.69% | 2.49% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.34% | 1.31% | 1.03% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 2.18% | 1.15% | 1.03% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.59% | 1.08% | 0.51% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 1.76% | 0.82% | 0.94% |
74.2% of DUHP is already inside JQUA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DUHP or JQUA?
DUHP has an expense ratio of 0.21% while JQUA charges 0.12%. JQUA is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DUHP or JQUA?
Over the past year DUHP returned +13.34% vs +21.86% for JQUA, so JQUA leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DUHP or JQUA?
DUHP has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.3% for JQUA. Worst drawdown: DUHP -20.1% vs JQUA -19.1%.
Should I hold both DUHP and JQUA?
DUHP and JQUA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DUHP and JQUA?
74.2% of DUHP's money is in holdings JQUA also owns. 43.8% of JQUA's is in holdings DUHP also owns. They hold 89 positions in common, counted across the 158 positions we hold weights for in DUHP and 306 in JQUA.
Which pays a higher dividend, DUHP or JQUA?
DUHP yields 0.85% while JQUA yields 1.08%, so JQUA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JQUA better than DUHP?
JQUA has a lower expense ratio. JQUA led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. JQUA is less concentrated, with 19.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.