DUHP vs QLV
Dimensional US High Profitability ETF vs Northern Trust US Quality Low Volatility ETF
Which is better, DUHP or QLV?
Each has led over a different period.
QLV has a lower expense ratio. DUHP led over 3Y and the full window, QLV over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. QLV is less concentrated, with 36.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DUHP | QLV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.21% | 0.08%Best |
| AUM | $19.7B | $171M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.85% | 1.50% |
| Holdings | 160 | 125 |
| YTD Return | +11.84% | +13.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.34% | +14.01%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.51%Best | +16.91% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.85% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 11.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.1% | -16.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $17,884Best | $17,016 |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.3% | 36.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | Northern Trust Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 23, 2022 | Jul 15, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.6 years).
DUHP vs QLV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
DUHP vs QLV Performance
Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) is an ETF from Dimensional and Northern Trust US Quality Low Volatility ETF (QLV) is an ETF from Northern Trust Asset Management. Over the past year DUHP returned +13.34% while QLV returned +14.01%. Year to date, DUHP is up 11.84% versus a gain of 13.30% for QLV.
Over three years, DUHP compounded at +18.51% per year against +16.91% for QLV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DUHP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.2% for QLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.1% for DUHP and -16.0% for QLV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DUHP charges 0.21% per year while QLV charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $21 vs $8 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DUHP currently yields 0.85% against 1.50% for QLV.
Holdings Overlap
58.4% of DUHP's money is in holdings QLV also owns. 47.3% of QLV's money is in holdings DUHP also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
37 positions in common, counted across the 158 positions we hold weights for in DUHP and 120 in QLV, against full books of 160 and 125.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 76 positions for QLV that do not appear in our book for DUHP (49.4% of the fund), and 113 for DUHP that do not appear in QLV (41.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DUHP | Weight in QLV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.90% | 6.86% | 1.04% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.41% | 6.09% | 1.32% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 4.90% | 6.58% | 1.68% |
| VVisa Inc. 'A' | 4.18% | 2.15% | 2.03% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 4.57% | 1.29% | 3.28% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 4.32% | 1.04% | 3.28% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.25% | 0.56% | 3.69% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.34% | 1.57% | 0.77% |
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 1.59% | 1.26% | 0.33% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.01% | 1.62% | 0.61% |
58.4% of DUHP is already inside QLV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DUHP or QLV?
DUHP has an expense ratio of 0.21% while QLV charges 0.08%. QLV is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DUHP or QLV?
Over the past year DUHP returned +13.34% vs +14.01% for QLV, so QLV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DUHP or QLV?
DUHP has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.2% for QLV. Worst drawdown: DUHP -20.1% vs QLV -16.0%.
Should I hold both DUHP and QLV?
DUHP and QLV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DUHP and QLV?
58.4% of DUHP's money is in holdings QLV also owns. 47.3% of QLV's is in holdings DUHP also owns. They hold 37 positions in common, counted across the 158 positions we hold weights for in DUHP and 120 in QLV.
Which pays a higher dividend, DUHP or QLV?
DUHP yields 0.85% while QLV yields 1.50%, so QLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QLV better than DUHP?
QLV has a lower expense ratio. DUHP led over 3Y and the full window, QLV over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. QLV is less concentrated, with 36.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.