DUHP vs RECI
Dimensional US High Profitability ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF
Which is better, DUHP or RECI?
DUHP costs less.
DUHP has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DUHP | RECI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.21%Best | 0.30% |
| AUM | $19.7B | $10M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.85% | 0.67% |
| Holdings | 160 | 715 |
| YTD Return | +11.84%Best | +2.97% |
| 1Y Return | +13.34% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.51% | - |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 23, 2022 | Jul 14, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
DUHP vs RECI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DUHP vs RECI Performance
Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) is an ETF from Dimensional and Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF (RECI) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Year to date, DUHP is up 11.84% versus a gain of 2.97% for RECI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DUHP charges 0.21% per year while RECI charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $21 vs $30 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DUHP currently yields 0.85% against 0.67% for RECI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 46.3% of DUHP's money is in holdings RECI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for RECI, our book for it covers 80.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
57 positions in common, counted across the 158 positions we hold weights for in DUHP and 354 in RECI, against full books of 160 and 715.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DUHP | Weight in RECI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.90% | 10.27% | 2.37% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.41% | 9.59% | 2.18% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.32% | 3.76% | 0.56% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.25% | 2.01% | 2.24% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.34% | 1.83% | 0.51% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 2.18% | 0.68% | 1.50% |
| TJXTjx Cos., Inc. | 1.01% | 1.04% | 0.03% |
| KLACKla-tencor | 1.41% | 0.39% | 1.02% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 0.87% | 0.84% | 0.03% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 1.46% | 0.24% | 1.22% |
46.3% of DUHP is already inside RECI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DUHP or RECI?
DUHP has an expense ratio of 0.21% while RECI charges 0.30%. DUHP is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between DUHP and RECI?
At least 46.3% of DUHP's money is in holdings RECI also owns. Our book for RECI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 57 positions in common, counted across the 158 positions we hold weights for in DUHP and 354 in RECI.
Which pays a higher dividend, DUHP or RECI?
DUHP yields 0.85% while RECI yields 0.67%, so DUHP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RECI better than DUHP?
DUHP has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.