DUKQ vs VTI
Ocean Park Domestic ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, DUKQ or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 94.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DUKQ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.98% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $10M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.29% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 26 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +11.94% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.63% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 12.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $12,540 | $14,228Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 94.2% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Ocean Park Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 11, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.3 years).
DUKQ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
DUKQ vs VTI Performance
Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ) is an ETF from Ocean Park Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DUKQ returned +14.63% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, DUKQ is up 11.94% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DUKQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 12.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for DUKQ and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DUKQ charges 0.98% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $3 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DUKQ currently yields 0.29% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 12 holdings in DUKQ and 3,441 in VTI, totalling 99.0% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 12 positions we hold weights for in DUKQ and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 26 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,156 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for DUKQ (97.6% of the fund), and 12 for DUKQ that do not appear in VTI (99.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DUKQ and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DUKQ or VTI?
DUKQ has an expense ratio of 0.98% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $95 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DUKQ or VTI?
Over the past year DUKQ returned +14.63% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), DUKQ annualized +10.34% vs +16.57% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DUKQ or VTI?
DUKQ has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 12.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DUKQ -18.4% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both DUKQ and VTI?
DUKQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DUKQ or VTI?
DUKQ yields 0.29% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than DUKQ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 94.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.