DUKX vs VTI
Ocean Park International ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, DUKX or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 99.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DUKX | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.03% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.84% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 26 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +6.67% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.77% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3%Tie | 12.3%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -19.6% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $11,614 | $14,228Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 99.3% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Ocean Park Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 11, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.3 years).
DUKX vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
DUKX vs VTI Performance
Ocean Park International ETF (DUKX) is an ETF from Ocean Park Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DUKX returned +12.77% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, DUKX is up 6.67% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DUKX and VTI have been equally volatile, both at 12.3% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.6% for DUKX and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DUKX charges 1.03% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $103 vs $3 annually, a gap of $100 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DUKX currently yields 1.84% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 10 holdings in DUKX and 3,441 in VTI, totalling 99.3% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 10 positions we hold weights for in DUKX and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 26 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,156 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for DUKX (97.6% of the fund), and 10 for DUKX that do not appear in VTI (99.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DUKX and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DUKX or VTI?
DUKX has an expense ratio of 1.03% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $100 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DUKX or VTI?
Over the past year DUKX returned +12.77% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), DUKX annualized +6.72% vs +16.57% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DUKX or VTI?
DUKX and VTI have been equally volatile, both at 12.3% annualized. Worst drawdown: DUKX -19.6% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both DUKX and VTI?
DUKX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DUKX or VTI?
DUKX yields 1.84% while VTI yields 1.06%, so DUKX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than DUKX?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 99.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.