DUSA vs SCHX
Davis Select US Equity ETF vs Schwab US Large-Cap ETF
Which is better, DUSA or SCHX?
Each has led over a different period.
SCHX has a lower expense ratio. DUSA led over 1Y, SCHX over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. SCHX is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DUSA | SCHX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.3B | $75.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.90% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 84 | 752 |
| YTD Return | +9.27% | +13.08%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.38%Best | +16.62% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.10% | +22.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.47% | +12.56%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.8% | 15.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.7% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,210 | $18,068Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 58.4% | 36.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Davis ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 11, 2017 | Nov 3, 2009 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 12, 2017 to Oct 14, 2026 (9.8 years).
DUSA vs SCHX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.8 years both funds cover.
DUSA vs SCHX Performance
Davis Select US Equity ETF (DUSA) is an ETF from Davis ETFs and Schwab US Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year DUSA returned +17.38% while SCHX returned +16.62%. Year to date, DUSA is up 9.27% versus a gain of 13.08% for SCHX.
Over three years, DUSA compounded at +22.10% per year against +22.27% for SCHX; over five years the annualized figures are +11.47% and +12.56% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, SCHX has the edge at +14.12% annualized vs +12.38%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DUSA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.8% compared with 15.7% for SCHX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.7% for DUSA and -34.3% for SCHX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DUSA charges 0.59% per year while SCHX charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DUSA currently yields 0.90% against 1.04% for SCHX.
Holdings Overlap
94.2% of DUSA's money is in holdings SCHX also owns. 11.8% of SCHX's money is in holdings DUSA also owns.
Most of DUSA is already inside SCHX. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
25 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in DUSA and 752 in SCHX, against full books of 84 and 752.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 704 positions for SCHX that do not appear in our book for DUSA (87.4% of the fund), and 1 for DUSA that do not appear in SCHX (3.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DUSA | Weight in SCHX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.85% | 3.50% | 2.35% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 6.70% | 2.28% | 4.42% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 5.24% | 2.29% | 2.95% |
| COFCapital One Financial Corp. | 7.01% | 0.17% | 6.84% |
| DVNDevon Energy Corp. | 6.50% | 0.07% | 6.43% |
| USBUS Bancorp | 6.17% | 0.13% | 6.04% |
| VTRSViatris | 5.98% | 0.03% | 5.95% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 4.52% | 1.33% | 3.19% |
| TSNTyson Foods Inc. Class A | 5.36% | 0.02% | 5.34% |
| CVSCvs Health Corp | 4.83% | 0.16% | 4.67% |
94.2% of DUSA is already inside SCHX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DUSA or SCHX?
DUSA has an expense ratio of 0.59% while SCHX charges 0.03%. SCHX is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DUSA or SCHX?
Over the past year DUSA returned +17.38% vs +16.62% for SCHX, so DUSA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), DUSA annualized +12.38% vs +14.12% for SCHX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DUSA or SCHX?
DUSA has been the more volatile fund at 17.8% annualized versus 15.7% for SCHX. Worst drawdown: DUSA -36.7% vs SCHX -34.3%.
Should I hold both DUSA and SCHX?
DUSA and SCHX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DUSA and SCHX?
94.2% of DUSA's money is in holdings SCHX also owns. 11.8% of SCHX's is in holdings DUSA also owns. They hold 25 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in DUSA and 752 in SCHX.
Which pays a higher dividend, DUSA or SCHX?
DUSA yields 0.90% while SCHX yields 1.04%, so SCHX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHX better than DUSA?
SCHX has a lower expense ratio. DUSA led over 1Y, SCHX over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. SCHX is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.