DUST vs MSFD
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bear 2X ETF vs Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X ETF
Which is better, DUST or MSFD?
MSFD has been ahead.
DUST has a lower expense ratio. MSFD led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DUST | MSFD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93%Best | 1.02% |
| AUM | $89M | $8M |
| Dividend Yield | 5.07% | 4.17% |
| Holdings | 14 | 6 |
| YTD Return | -39.87% | -16.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | -55.63% | -9.00%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -66.09% | -15.33%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -51.68% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 70.2% | 25.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -98.9% | -62.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.1 years | $202 | $4,537Best |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Direxion Shares ETF Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Trading-Inverse Equity |
| Inception | Dec 8, 2010 | Sep 7, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 8, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.1 years).
DUST vs MSFD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.1 years both funds cover.
DUST vs MSFD Performance
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bear 2X ETF (DUST) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X ETF (MSFD) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year DUST returned -55.63% while MSFD returned -9.00%. Year to date, DUST is down 39.87% versus a loss of 16.44% for MSFD.
Over three years, DUST compounded at -66.09% per year against -15.33% for MSFD. Across the full 4-year window we track, MSFD has the edge at -17.53% annualized vs -61.38%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DUST has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 70.2% compared with 25.7% for MSFD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -98.9% for DUST and -62.1% for MSFD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.11. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DUST charges 0.93% per year while MSFD charges 1.02%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $102 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DUST currently yields 5.07% against 4.17% for MSFD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in DUST and 3 in MSFD, totalling 102.4% and 108.3% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 2 positions appear in both.
2 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in DUST and 3 in MSFD, against full books of 14 and 6.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DUST and MSFD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DUST or MSFD?
DUST has an expense ratio of 0.93% while MSFD charges 1.02%. DUST is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DUST or MSFD?
Over the past year DUST returned -55.63% vs -9.00% for MSFD, so MSFD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DUST annualized -61.38% vs -17.53% for MSFD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DUST or MSFD?
DUST has been the more volatile fund at 70.2% annualized versus 25.7% for MSFD. Worst drawdown: DUST -98.9% vs MSFD -62.1%.
Should I hold both DUST and MSFD?
DUST and MSFD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.11, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DUST or MSFD?
DUST yields 5.07% while MSFD yields 4.17%, so DUST currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MSFD better than DUST?
DUST has a lower expense ratio. MSFD led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.