DUST vs NVDS
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bear 2X ETF vs Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF
Which is better, DUST or NVDS?
Each has led over a different period.
DUST has a lower expense ratio. DUST led over the full window, NVDS over 1Y and 3Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DUST | NVDS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93%Best | 1.15% |
| AUM | $89M | $11M |
| Dividend Yield | 5.07% | 22.47% |
| Holdings | 14 | 6 |
| YTD Return | -39.87% | -32.79%Best |
| 1Y Return | -55.63% | -39.46%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -66.09% | -63.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -51.68% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 69.8% | 52.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -98.9% | - |
| $10,000 over 4.3 years | $208Best | $79 |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Tradr ETFs |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Trading-Inverse Equity |
| Inception | Dec 8, 2010 | Jul 13, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.3 years).
DUST vs NVDS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.3 years both funds cover.
DUST vs NVDS Performance
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bear 2X ETF (DUST) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVDS) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs. Over the past year DUST returned -55.63% while NVDS returned -39.46%. Year to date, DUST is down 39.87% versus a loss of 32.79% for NVDS.
Over three years, DUST compounded at -66.09% per year against -63.27% for NVDS. Across the full 4-year window we track, DUST has the edge at -59.39% annualized vs -67.59%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DUST has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 69.8% compared with 52.8% for NVDS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.00. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DUST charges 0.93% per year while NVDS charges 1.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $115 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DUST currently yields 5.07% against 22.47% for NVDS.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DUST and NVDS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DUST or NVDS?
DUST has an expense ratio of 0.93% while NVDS charges 1.15%. DUST is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DUST or NVDS?
Over the past year DUST returned -55.63% vs -39.46% for NVDS, so NVDS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DUST annualized -59.39% vs -67.59% for NVDS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DUST or NVDS?
DUST has been the more volatile fund at 69.8% annualized versus 52.8% for NVDS.
Should I hold both DUST and NVDS?
DUST and NVDS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.00, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DUST or NVDS?
DUST yields 5.07% while NVDS yields 22.47%, so NVDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NVDS better than DUST?
DUST has a lower expense ratio. DUST led over the full window, NVDS over 1Y and 3Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.