DUST vs SH

DUST vs SH

Which is better, DUST or SH?

SH has been ahead.

SH has a lower expense ratio. SH led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: SHHigher Returns: SH

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDUSTSH
Expense Ratio0.93%0.88%Best
AUM$89M$964M
Dividend Yield5.07%3.92%
Holdings1416
YTD Return-39.87%-8.49%Best
1Y Return-55.63%-10.36%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-66.09%-13.82%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-51.68%-8.55%Best
Volatility (annualized)90.1%13.3%Best
Max Drawdown--90.3%
$10,000 over 5 years$263$6,396Best
Fund FamilyDirexion Shares ETF TrustProShares
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleTrading-Inverse EquityTrading-Inverse Equity
InceptionDec 8, 2010Jun 19, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 8, 2010 to Oct 14, 2026 (15.8 years).

DUST vs SH growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.8 years both funds cover.

Compare DUST against instead:DUST vs SPYDUST vs QQQDUST vs VOODUST vs VTISH against:SH vs VXUS

DUST vs SH Performance

Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bear 2X ETF (DUST) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) is an ETF from ProShares. Over the past year DUST returned -55.63% while SH returned -10.36%. Year to date, DUST is down 39.87% versus a loss of 8.49% for SH.

Over three years, DUST compounded at -66.09% per year against -13.82% for SH; over five years the annualized figures are -51.68% and -8.55% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, SH has the edge at -13.26% annualized vs -49.55%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

DUST has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 90.1% compared with 13.3% for SH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.13. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DUST charges 0.93% per year while SH charges 0.88%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $88 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DUST currently yields 5.07% against 3.92% for SH.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 2 holdings in DUST and 1 in SH, totalling 102.4% and 87.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in DUST and 1 in SH, against full books of 14 and 16.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of DUST and SH you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

DUSTSH

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DUST or SH?

DUST has an expense ratio of 0.93% while SH charges 0.88%. SH is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, DUST or SH?

Over the past year DUST returned -55.63% vs -10.36% for SH, so SH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), DUST annualized -49.55% vs -13.26% for SH. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, DUST or SH?

DUST has been the more volatile fund at 90.1% annualized versus 13.3% for SH.

Should I hold both DUST and SH?

DUST and SH have a monthly-return correlation of 0.13, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, DUST or SH?

DUST yields 5.07% while SH yields 3.92%, so DUST currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SH better than DUST?

SH has a lower expense ratio. SH led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.