DUST vs TSLQ
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bear 2X ETF vs Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF
Which is better, DUST or TSLQ?
TSLQ has been ahead.
DUST has a lower expense ratio. TSLQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DUST | TSLQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93%Best | 1.15% |
| AUM | $89M | $92M |
| Dividend Yield | 5.07% | 9.89% |
| Holdings | 14 | 12 |
| YTD Return | -39.87% | -6.17%Best |
| 1Y Return | -55.63% | -19.23%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -66.09% | -65.37%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -51.68% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 69.8%Best | 86.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -98.9% | -98.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.3 years | $208 | $264Best |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Tradr ETFs |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Trading-Inverse Equity |
| Inception | Dec 8, 2010 | Jul 13, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.3 years).
DUST vs TSLQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.3 years both funds cover.
DUST vs TSLQ Performance
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bear 2X ETF (DUST) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs. Over the past year DUST returned -55.63% while TSLQ returned -19.23%. Year to date, DUST is down 39.87% versus a loss of 6.17% for TSLQ.
Over three years, DUST compounded at -66.09% per year against -65.37% for TSLQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, TSLQ has the edge at -57.06% annualized vs -59.39%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TSLQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 86.8% compared with 69.8% for DUST. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -98.9% for DUST and -98.7% for TSLQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.09. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DUST charges 0.93% per year while TSLQ charges 1.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $115 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DUST currently yields 5.07% against 9.89% for TSLQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in DUST and 1 in TSLQ, totalling 102.4% and 5.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in DUST and 1 in TSLQ, against full books of 14 and 12.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DUST and TSLQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DUST or TSLQ?
DUST has an expense ratio of 0.93% while TSLQ charges 1.15%. DUST is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DUST or TSLQ?
Over the past year DUST returned -55.63% vs -19.23% for TSLQ, so TSLQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DUST annualized -59.39% vs -57.06% for TSLQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DUST or TSLQ?
TSLQ has been the more volatile fund at 86.8% annualized versus 69.8% for DUST. Worst drawdown: DUST -98.9% vs TSLQ -98.7%.
Should I hold both DUST and TSLQ?
DUST and TSLQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.09, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DUST or TSLQ?
DUST yields 5.07% while TSLQ yields 9.89%, so TSLQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TSLQ better than DUST?
DUST has a lower expense ratio. TSLQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.