DVND vs FBCV
Touchstone Dividend Select ETF vs Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF
Which is better, DVND or FBCV?
Each has led over a different period.
DVND has a lower expense ratio. DVND led over 3Y and the full window, FBCV over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. DVND is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DVND | FBCV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Best | 0.57% |
| AUM | $54M | $184M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.81% | 1.25% |
| Holdings | 112 | 127 |
| YTD Return | +11.56% | +18.42%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.57% | +24.20%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.34%Best | +16.61% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.11% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8% | -14.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.2 years | $16,802Best | $16,126 |
| Top 10 Weight | 28.8%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Touchstone Investments | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 2, 2022 | Jun 2, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 4, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.2 years).
DVND vs FBCV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.2 years both funds cover.
DVND vs FBCV Performance
Touchstone Dividend Select ETF (DVND) is an ETF from Touchstone Investments and Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Over the past year DVND returned +14.57% while FBCV returned +24.20%. Year to date, DVND is up 11.56% versus a gain of 18.42% for FBCV.
Over three years, DVND compounded at +17.34% per year against +16.61% for FBCV. Across the full 4-year window we track, DVND has the edge at +13.15% annualized vs +12.05%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DVND has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.2% compared with 12.8% for FBCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for DVND and -14.3% for FBCV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DVND charges 0.50% per year while FBCV charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $57 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DVND currently yields 1.81% against 1.25% for FBCV.
Holdings Overlap
44.5% of DVND's money is in holdings FBCV also owns. 36.3% of FBCV's money is in holdings DVND also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, DVND as of Oct 1, 2026 and FBCV as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
22 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in DVND and 133 in FBCV, against full books of 112 and 127.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 90 positions for FBCV that do not appear in our book for DVND (54.3% of the fund), and 34 for DVND that do not appear in FBCV (55.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DVND | Weight in FBCV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.29% | 5.24% | 0.05% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.74% | 7.46% | 5.72% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.10% | 4.64% | 1.54% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 2.46% | 3.37% | 0.91% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 1.79% | 2.64% | 0.85% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.66% | 2.30% | 0.64% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.56% | 1.04% | 1.52% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.22% | 1.06% | 1.16% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 1.98% | 1.11% | 0.87% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 1.54% | 1.45% | 0.09% |
44.5% of DVND is already inside FBCV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DVND or FBCV?
DVND has an expense ratio of 0.50% while FBCV charges 0.57%. DVND is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DVND or FBCV?
Over the past year DVND returned +14.57% vs +24.20% for FBCV, so FBCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DVND annualized +13.15% vs +12.05% for FBCV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DVND or FBCV?
DVND has been the more volatile fund at 13.2% annualized versus 12.8% for FBCV. Worst drawdown: DVND -14.8% vs FBCV -14.3%.
Should I hold both DVND and FBCV?
DVND and FBCV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DVND and FBCV?
44.5% of DVND's money is in holdings FBCV also owns. 36.3% of FBCV's is in holdings DVND also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in DVND and 133 in FBCV.
Which pays a higher dividend, DVND or FBCV?
DVND yields 1.81% while FBCV yields 1.25%, so DVND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FBCV better than DVND?
DVND has a lower expense ratio. DVND led over 3Y and the full window, FBCV over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. DVND is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.