DVND vs JAVA
Touchstone Dividend Select ETF vs JPMorgan Active Value ETF
Which is better, DVND or JAVA?
Nearly the same fund. JAVA costs less.
JAVA has a lower expense ratio. JAVA led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. DVND is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 29.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DVND | JAVA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.44%Best |
| AUM | $54M | $7.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.81% | 1.19% |
| Holdings | 112 | 153 |
| YTD Return | +11.56% | +13.15%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.57% | +20.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.34% | +18.31%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.63% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2%Best | 13.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8%Best | -16.5% |
| $10,000 over 4.2 years | $16,802 | $17,357Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 28.8%Best | 29.8% |
| Fund Family | Touchstone Investments | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 2, 2022 | Oct 4, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 4, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.2 years).
DVND vs JAVA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.2 years both funds cover.
DVND vs JAVA Performance
Touchstone Dividend Select ETF (DVND) is an ETF from Touchstone Investments and JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year DVND returned +14.57% while JAVA returned +20.54%. Year to date, DVND is up 11.56% versus a gain of 13.15% for JAVA.
Over three years, DVND compounded at +17.34% per year against +18.31% for JAVA. Across the full 4-year window we track, JAVA has the edge at +14.03% annualized vs +13.15%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JAVA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.9% compared with 13.2% for DVND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for DVND and -16.5% for JAVA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DVND charges 0.50% per year while JAVA charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $44 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DVND currently yields 1.81% against 1.19% for JAVA.
Holdings Overlap
59.2% of DVND's money is in holdings JAVA also owns. 40.4% of JAVA's money is in holdings DVND also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
32 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in DVND and 151 in JAVA, against full books of 112 and 153.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 118 positions for JAVA that do not appear in our book for DVND (59.3% of the fund), and 24 for DVND that do not appear in JAVA (40.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DVND | Weight in JAVA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.29% | 6.29% | 1.00% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.74% | 7.63% | 5.89% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.10% | 3.41% | 0.31% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.56% | 1.60% | 0.96% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 1.79% | 2.19% | 0.40% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 1.63% | 2.13% | 0.50% |
| SCHWSchwab Strategic T | 1.64% | 1.65% | 0.01% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.98% | 1.26% | 0.72% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 1.99% | 1.21% | 0.78% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 2.11% | 1.07% | 1.04% |
59.2% of DVND is already inside JAVA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DVND or JAVA?
DVND has an expense ratio of 0.50% while JAVA charges 0.44%. JAVA is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DVND or JAVA?
Over the past year DVND returned +14.57% vs +20.54% for JAVA, so JAVA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DVND annualized +13.15% vs +14.03% for JAVA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DVND or JAVA?
JAVA has been the more volatile fund at 13.9% annualized versus 13.2% for DVND. Worst drawdown: DVND -14.8% vs JAVA -16.5%.
Should I hold both DVND and JAVA?
DVND and JAVA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DVND and JAVA?
59.2% of DVND's money is in holdings JAVA also owns. 40.4% of JAVA's is in holdings DVND also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in DVND and 151 in JAVA.
Which pays a higher dividend, DVND or JAVA?
DVND yields 1.81% while JAVA yields 1.19%, so DVND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JAVA better than DVND?
JAVA has a lower expense ratio. JAVA led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. DVND is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 29.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.