DWLD vs MOO
Davis Select Worldwide ETF vs VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Which is better, DWLD or MOO?
Each has led over a different period.
MOO has a lower expense ratio. DWLD led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, MOO over 1Y. DWLD is less concentrated, with 26.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DWLD | MOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.63% | 0.56%Best |
| AUM | $579M | $1.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.94% | 2.20% |
| Holdings | 40 | 51 |
| YTD Return | -4.08% | +11.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.46% | +16.95%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.75%Best | +4.13% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.10%Best | -0.90% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 17.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.3%Best | -41.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,457Best | $9,558 |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.6%Best | 56.9% |
| Fund Family | Davis ETFs | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 11, 2017 | Aug 31, 2007 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 12, 2017 to Oct 14, 2026 (9.8 years).
DWLD vs MOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.8 years both funds cover.
DWLD vs MOO Performance
Davis Select Worldwide ETF (DWLD) is an ETF from Davis ETFs and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) is an ETF from VanEck. Over the past year DWLD returned +2.46% while MOO returned +16.95%. Year to date, DWLD is down 4.08% versus a gain of 11.54% for MOO.
Over three years, DWLD compounded at +18.75% per year against +4.13% for MOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.10% and -0.90% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, DWLD has the edge at +9.90% annualized vs +6.26%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DWLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 17.4% for MOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.3% for DWLD and -41.5% for MOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DWLD charges 0.63% per year while MOO charges 0.56%. On a $10,000 position that is $63 vs $56 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DWLD currently yields 0.94% against 2.20% for MOO.
Holdings Overlap
0.4% of DWLD's money is in holdings MOO also owns. 50.0% of MOO's money is in holdings DWLD also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 1,395 positions we hold weights for in DWLD and 47 in MOO, against full books of 40 and 51.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 11 positions for MOO that do not appear in our book for DWLD (23.0% of the fund), and 463 for DWLD that do not appear in MOO (67.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DWLD | Weight in MOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEDeere & Co. | 0.18% | 8.48% | 8.30% |
| CTVACorteva Inc. | 0.01% | 6.86% | 6.85% |
| NTR:CANutrien Ltd | 0.04% | 6.05% | 6.01% |
| ADMAdm Un Equity | 0.04% | 5.88% | 5.84% |
| ZTSZoetis, Inc. | 0.03% | 5.60% | 5.57% |
| 6326:JPKubota Corp | 0.02% | 5.07% | 5.05% |
| TSNTyson Foods Inc. Class A | 0.01% | 3.60% | 3.59% |
| WLIL:SIWilmar International Limited Wilmar International Limited | 0.01% | 2.79% | 2.78% |
| YAR:OSYara International ASA Shs | 0.01% | 2.46% | 2.45% |
| JEP:BESalmar Asa | 0.01% | 1.71% | 1.70% |
50.0% of MOO is already inside DWLD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DWLD or MOO?
DWLD has an expense ratio of 0.63% while MOO charges 0.56%. MOO is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DWLD or MOO?
Over the past year DWLD returned +2.46% vs +16.95% for MOO, so MOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), DWLD annualized +9.90% vs +6.26% for MOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DWLD or MOO?
DWLD has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 17.4% for MOO. Worst drawdown: DWLD -39.3% vs MOO -41.5%.
Should I hold both DWLD and MOO?
DWLD and MOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DWLD and MOO?
50.0% of MOO's money is in holdings DWLD also owns. 50.0% of MOO's is in holdings DWLD also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 1,395 positions we hold weights for in DWLD and 47 in MOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, DWLD or MOO?
DWLD yields 0.94% while MOO yields 2.20%, so MOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MOO better than DWLD?
MOO has a lower expense ratio. DWLD led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, MOO over 1Y. DWLD is less concentrated, with 26.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.