DWSH vs VTI
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, DWSH or VTI?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.82, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DWSH | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 6.22% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 6.68% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 101 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -8.24% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | -8.93% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -7.86% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.01% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.7% | 17.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -84.5% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,583 | $17,616Best |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 11, 2018 to Oct 14, 2026 (8.3 years).
DWSH vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.3 years both funds cover.
DWSH vs VTI Performance
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) is an ETF from Advisor Shares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DWSH returned -8.93% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, DWSH is down 8.24% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, DWSH compounded at -7.86% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -3.01% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.49% annualized vs -13.75%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DWSH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.7% compared with 17.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -84.5% for DWSH and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.82. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DWSH charges 6.22% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $622 vs $3 annually, a gap of $619 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DWSH currently yields 6.68% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 3.2% of VTI's money is in holdings DWSH also owns.
Stated as a floor: for DWSH, our book for it covers 0.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
They hold the same names on opposite sides, so owning both offsets the exposure rather than doubling it.
97 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in DWSH and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 101 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DWSH | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NFLXNetflix, Inc., Long Equities | -0.70% | 0.46% | 1.16% |
| ORCLOracle Corp Common | -0.66% | 0.35% | 1.01% |
| CABOCable One, Inc. | -0.38% | 0.00% | 0.38% |
| CMGChipotle Mexican Grill Inc. Class A | -0.47% | 0.07% | 0.54% |
| BSXBoston Scientific Corp. | -0.52% | 0.10% | 0.62% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems Inc. | -0.61% | 0.16% | 0.77% |
| AREAlexandria Real Estate Equities | -0.48% | 0.01% | 0.49% |
| CHTRCharter Communications Inc Cl A | -0.49% | 0.02% | 0.51% |
| EFXEquifax Inc. | -0.50% | 0.03% | 0.53% |
| GTGoodyear Tire & Rubber Co/the | -0.48% | 0.00% | 0.48% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DWSH and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DWSH or VTI?
DWSH has an expense ratio of 6.22% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $619 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DWSH or VTI?
Over the past year DWSH returned -8.93% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), DWSH annualized -13.75% vs +13.49% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DWSH or VTI?
DWSH has been the more volatile fund at 30.7% annualized versus 17.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DWSH -84.5% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both DWSH and VTI?
DWSH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.82, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DWSH and VTI?
At least 3.2% of VTI's money is in holdings DWSH also owns. Our book for DWSH is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 97 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in DWSH and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, DWSH or VTI?
DWSH yields 6.68% while VTI yields 1.06%, so DWSH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than DWSH?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.82, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.