DWUS vs QRFT
Advisorshares Dorsey Wright Fsm Us Core Etf vs Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap ETF
Which is better, DWUS or QRFT?
QRFT has been ahead.
QRFT has a lower expense ratio. QRFT led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DWUS | QRFT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.08% | 0.75%Best |
| AUM | $122M | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 0.25% |
| Holdings | 4 | 301 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 18.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -30.5% | -30.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 6.6 years | $24,328 | $25,899Best |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | QRAFT AI ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 26, 2019 | May 20, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 85 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. DWUS has data through Oct 14, 2026 and QRFT through Jul 21, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 6.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 27, 2019 to Jul 21, 2026 (6.6 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DWUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 18.0% for QRFT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.5% for DWUS and -30.2% for QRFT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DWUS charges 1.08% per year while QRFT charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $108 vs $75 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DWUS currently yields 0.03% against 0.25% for QRFT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 4 holdings in DWUS and 294 in QRFT, totalling 100.0% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 155 days apart, DWUS as of Oct 2, 2026 and QRFT as of Apr 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 4 positions we hold weights for in DWUS and 294 in QRFT, against full books of 4 and 301.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DWUS and QRFT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DWUS or QRFT?
DWUS has an expense ratio of 1.08% while QRFT charges 0.75%. QRFT is the cheaper option, by $33 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, DWUS or QRFT?
DWUS has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 18.0% for QRFT. Worst drawdown: DWUS -30.5% vs QRFT -30.2%.
Should I hold both DWUS and QRFT?
DWUS and QRFT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DWUS or QRFT?
DWUS yields 0.03% while QRFT yields 0.25%, so QRFT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QRFT better than DWUS?
QRFT has a lower expense ratio. QRFT led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.