DWWN vs VTI
Principal Long Duration ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, DWWN or VTI?
Long Term Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. DWWN is less concentrated, with 30.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DWWN | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $10M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.54% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 117 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -8.76% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Top 10 Weight | 30.0%Best | 33.5% |
| Fund Family | Principal Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Long Term Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 21, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
DWWN vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DWWN vs VTI Performance
Principal Long Duration ETF (DWWN) is an ETF from Principal Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, DWWN is down 8.76% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DWWN charges 0.19% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DWWN currently yields 1.54% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 54 holdings in DWWN and 3,441 in VTI, totalling 95.3% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in DWWN and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 117 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,156 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for DWWN (97.6% of the fund), and 54 for DWWN that do not appear in VTI (95.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DWWN and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DWWN or VTI?
DWWN has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, DWWN or VTI?
DWWN yields 1.54% while VTI yields 1.06%, so DWWN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than DWWN?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. DWWN is less concentrated, with 30.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.