DXUV vs HWO

DXUV vs HWO

Which is better, DXUV or HWO?

HWO has been ahead.

DXUV has a lower expense ratio. HWO led over 1Y. DXUV is less concentrated, with 23.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%.

Lower Fees: DXUVHigher Returns (1Y): HWOLess Concentrated: DXUV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDXUVHWO
Expense Ratio0.25%Best0.90%
AUM$6.2B$532,756.73
Dividend Yield0.99%0.00%
Holdings2,03053
YTD Return+13.52%Best+5.80%
1Y Return+18.04%-
Top 10 Weight23.1%Best45.5%
Fund FamilyDimensionalHotchkis & Wiley Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap ValueMid Cap Value
InceptionSep 13, 2024Jul 22, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

DXUV vs HWO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare DXUV against instead:DXUV vs SPYDXUV vs QQQDXUV vs VOODXUV vs VTIHWO against:HWO vs VXUS

DXUV vs HWO Performance

Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) is an ETF from Dimensional and Hotchkis & Wiley Opportunities Fund ETF (HWO) is an ETF from Hotchkis & Wiley Funds. Year to date, DXUV is up 13.52% versus a gain of 5.80% for HWO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DXUV charges 0.25% per year while HWO charges 0.90%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $90 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DXUV currently yields 0.99% against 0.00% for HWO.

Holdings Overlap

DXUV already in HWO8.9%
HWO already in DXUV59.5%

8.9% of DXUV's money is in holdings HWO also owns. 59.5% of HWO's money is in holdings DXUV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

35 positions in common, counted across the 2,027 positions we hold weights for in DXUV and 53 in HWO, against full books of 2,030 and 53.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 10 positions for HWO that do not appear in our book for DXUV (23.1% of the fund), and 1,352 for DXUV that do not appear in HWO (87.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in DXUVWeight in HWODifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.00%5.88%0.88%
CDWCDW Corporation0.08%3.92%3.84%
SLMSlm Corp0.07%3.77%3.70%
PPGPpg Industries Inc.0.08%3.25%3.17%
APAApa Corp0.10%2.73%2.63%
CRCCalifornia Resources Corp Common Stock0.05%2.69%2.64%
STGWStagwell Inc Class A0.02%2.54%2.52%
AIGAmerican International Gr0.11%2.39%2.28%
OVVOvintiv Inc.0.08%2.38%2.30%
CICigna Corp.0.20%2.19%1.99%

59.5% of HWO is already inside DXUV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

DXUVHWO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DXUV or HWO?

DXUV has an expense ratio of 0.25% while HWO charges 0.90%. DXUV is the cheaper option, by $65 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between DXUV and HWO?

59.5% of HWO's money is in holdings DXUV also owns. 59.5% of HWO's is in holdings DXUV also owns. They hold 35 positions in common, counted across the 2,027 positions we hold weights for in DXUV and 53 in HWO.

Which pays a higher dividend, DXUV or HWO?

DXUV yields 0.99% while HWO yields 0.00%, so DXUV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is HWO better than DXUV?

DXUV has a lower expense ratio. HWO led over 1Y. DXUV is less concentrated, with 23.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.