DYLD vs SIFI
LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF vs Harbor Ares Systematic Multi-Sector Income ETF
Which is better, DYLD or SIFI?
SIFI has been ahead.
SIFI has a lower expense ratio. SIFI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DYLD | SIFI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $35M | $23M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.24% | 8.29% |
| Holdings | 65 | 374 |
| YTD Return | +0.50%Best | -0.24% |
| 1Y Return | +0.96% | +1.03%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.67% | +7.09%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.75% | +2.23%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.9%Best | 5.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.0% | -14.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,381 | $11,166Best |
| Fund Family | LeaderShares | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | Diversified Sectoral Bond | Diversified Sectoral Bond |
| Inception | Jun 28, 2021 | Sep 14, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.1 years).
DYLD vs SIFI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.1 years both funds cover.
DYLD vs SIFI Performance
LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF (DYLD) is an ETF from LeaderShares and Harbor Ares Systematic Multi-Sector Income ETF (SIFI) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Over the past year DYLD returned +0.96% while SIFI returned +1.03%. Year to date, DYLD is up 0.50% versus a loss of 0.24% for SIFI.
Over three years, DYLD compounded at +4.67% per year against +7.09% for SIFI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.75% and +2.23% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SIFI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.7% compared with 4.9% for DYLD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.0% for DYLD and -14.7% for SIFI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DYLD charges 0.75% per year while SIFI charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $50 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DYLD currently yields 4.24% against 8.29% for SIFI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 31 holdings in DYLD and 143 in SIFI, totalling 99.8% and 73.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in DYLD and 143 in SIFI, against full books of 65 and 374.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DYLD and SIFI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DYLD or SIFI?
DYLD has an expense ratio of 0.75% while SIFI charges 0.50%. SIFI is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DYLD or SIFI?
Over the past year DYLD returned +0.96% vs +1.03% for SIFI, so SIFI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DYLD or SIFI?
SIFI has been the more volatile fund at 5.7% annualized versus 4.9% for DYLD. Worst drawdown: DYLD -15.0% vs SIFI -14.7%.
Should I hold both DYLD and SIFI?
DYLD and SIFI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DYLD or SIFI?
DYLD yields 4.24% while SIFI yields 8.29%, so SIFI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SIFI better than DYLD?
SIFI has a lower expense ratio. SIFI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.