DYLG vs FDEC

DYLG vs FDEC

Which is better, DYLG or FDEC?

FDEC has been ahead.

DYLG has a lower expense ratio. FDEC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: DYLGHigher Returns: FDEC

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDYLGFDEC
Expense Ratio0.35%Best0.85%
AUM$5M$1.3B
Dividend Yield9.33%0.00%
Holdings6610
YTD Return+7.96%+10.08%Best
1Y Return+13.55%+14.78%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+14.15%+16.28%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+10.68%
Volatility (annualized)9.4%8.5%Best
Max Drawdown-14.2%-13.0%Best
$10,000 over 3.2 years$14,429$15,312Best
Fund FamilyGlobal X by mirae AssetFirst Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionJul 25, 2023Dec 18, 2020

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 26, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.2 years).

DYLG vs FDEC growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.

Compare DYLG against instead:DYLG vs SPYDYLG vs QQQDYLG vs VOODYLG vs VTIFDEC against:FDEC vs VXUS

DYLG vs FDEC Performance

Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - December (FDEC) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year DYLG returned +13.55% while FDEC returned +14.78%. Year to date, DYLG is up 7.96% versus a gain of 10.08% for FDEC.

Over three years, DYLG compounded at +14.15% per year against +16.28% for FDEC.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

DYLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.4% compared with 8.5% for FDEC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.2% for DYLG and -13.0% for FDEC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DYLG charges 0.35% per year while FDEC charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $85 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DYLG currently yields 9.33% against 0.00% for FDEC.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of DYLG and FDEC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

DYLGFDEC

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DYLG or FDEC?

DYLG has an expense ratio of 0.35% while FDEC charges 0.85%. DYLG is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, DYLG or FDEC?

Over the past year DYLG returned +13.55% vs +14.78% for FDEC, so FDEC leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, DYLG or FDEC?

DYLG has been the more volatile fund at 9.4% annualized versus 8.5% for FDEC. Worst drawdown: DYLG -14.2% vs FDEC -13.0%.

Should I hold both DYLG and FDEC?

DYLG and FDEC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, DYLG or FDEC?

DYLG yields 9.33% while FDEC yields 0.00%, so DYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is FDEC better than DYLG?

DYLG has a lower expense ratio. FDEC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.