DYLG vs XYLD
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
Which is better, DYLG or XYLD?
Each has led over a different period.
DYLG has a lower expense ratio. DYLG led over 3Y and the full window, XYLD over 1Y. XYLD is less concentrated, with 39.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DYLG | XYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35%Best | 0.60% |
| AUM | $5M | $3.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 9.33% | 10.44% |
| Holdings | 66 | 1,014 |
| YTD Return | +7.96% | +11.42%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.55% | +18.43%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.15%Best | +13.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.59% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.4% | 6.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.2%Best | -16.1% |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $14,429Best | $14,240 |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.5% | 39.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jul 25, 2023 | Jun 21, 2013 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 26, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.2 years).
DYLG vs XYLD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
DYLG vs XYLD Performance
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year DYLG returned +13.55% while XYLD returned +18.43%. Year to date, DYLG is up 7.96% versus a gain of 11.42% for XYLD.
Over three years, DYLG compounded at +14.15% per year against +13.38% for XYLD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DYLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.4% compared with 6.5% for XYLD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.2% for DYLG and -16.1% for XYLD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DYLG charges 0.35% per year while XYLD charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $60 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DYLG currently yields 9.33% against 10.44% for XYLD.
Holdings Overlap
100.0% of DYLG's money is in holdings XYLD also owns. 40.0% of XYLD's money is in holdings DYLG also owns.
Most of DYLG is already inside XYLD. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
30 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in DYLG and 496 in XYLD, against full books of 66 and 1,014.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 462 positions for XYLD that do not appear in our book for DYLG (61.2% of the fund), and 0 for DYLG that do not appear in XYLD (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DYLG | Weight in XYLD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.02% | 5.87% | 0.15% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.72% | 8.64% | 5.92% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.88% | 7.44% | 3.56% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc/The | 10.49% | 0.40% | 10.09% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 9.83% | 0.59% | 9.24% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.99% | 3.07% | 0.92% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.92% | 3.77% | 0.85% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.86% | 1.35% | 2.51% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.19% | 0.94% | 3.25% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 4.68% | 0.33% | 4.35% |
100.0% of DYLG is already inside XYLD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DYLG or XYLD?
DYLG has an expense ratio of 0.35% while XYLD charges 0.60%. DYLG is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DYLG or XYLD?
Over the past year DYLG returned +13.55% vs +18.43% for XYLD, so XYLD leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DYLG or XYLD?
DYLG has been the more volatile fund at 9.4% annualized versus 6.5% for XYLD. Worst drawdown: DYLG -14.2% vs XYLD -16.1%.
Should I hold both DYLG and XYLD?
DYLG and XYLD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DYLG and XYLD?
100.0% of DYLG's money is in holdings XYLD also owns. 40.0% of XYLD's is in holdings DYLG also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in DYLG and 496 in XYLD.
Which pays a higher dividend, DYLG or XYLD?
DYLG yields 9.33% while XYLD yields 10.44%, so XYLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XYLD better than DYLG?
DYLG has a lower expense ratio. DYLG led over 3Y and the full window, XYLD over 1Y. XYLD is less concentrated, with 39.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.