DYTA vs UMI
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF vs USCF Midstream Energy Income ETF
Which is better, DYTA or UMI?
UMI has been ahead.
UMI has a lower expense ratio. UMI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DYTA | UMI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.32% | 0.69%Best |
| AUM | $109M | $527M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.51% | 6.27% |
| Holdings | 16 | 25 |
| YTD Return | +7.81% | +22.12%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.60% | +28.10%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.31% | +23.91%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.00% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.0%Best | 14.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.7%Best | -17.1% |
| $10,000 over 3.5 years | $14,111 | $21,291Best |
| Top 10 Weight | - | 62.2% |
| Fund Family | Summit Global Investments | USCF Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | All Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2023 | Mar 24, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 30, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.5 years).
DYTA vs UMI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.5 years both funds cover.
DYTA vs UMI Performance
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA) is an ETF from Summit Global Investments and USCF Midstream Energy Income ETF (UMI) is an ETF from USCF Investments. Over the past year DYTA returned +9.60% while UMI returned +28.10%. Year to date, DYTA is up 7.81% versus a gain of 22.12% for UMI.
Over three years, DYTA compounded at +12.31% per year against +23.91% for UMI. Across the full 4-year window we track, UMI has the edge at +24.10% annualized vs +10.34%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UMI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.9% compared with 10.0% for DYTA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.7% for DYTA and -17.1% for UMI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DYTA charges 1.32% per year while UMI charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $132 vs $69 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DYTA currently yields 1.51% against 6.27% for UMI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 8 holdings in DYTA and 23 in UMI, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 8 positions we hold weights for in DYTA and 23 in UMI, against full books of 16 and 25.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 16 positions for UMI that do not appear in our book for DYTA (74.3% of the fund), and 8 for DYTA that do not appear in UMI (100.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DYTA and UMI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DYTA or UMI?
DYTA has an expense ratio of 1.32% while UMI charges 0.69%. UMI is the cheaper option, by $63 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DYTA or UMI?
Over the past year DYTA returned +9.60% vs +28.10% for UMI, so UMI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DYTA annualized +10.34% vs +24.10% for UMI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DYTA or UMI?
UMI has been the more volatile fund at 14.9% annualized versus 10.0% for DYTA. Worst drawdown: DYTA -9.7% vs UMI -17.1%.
Should I hold both DYTA and UMI?
DYTA and UMI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DYTA or UMI?
DYTA yields 1.51% while UMI yields 6.27%, so UMI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is UMI better than DYTA?
UMI has a lower expense ratio. UMI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.