EAFG vs VYM
Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, EAFG or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 28.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EAFG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.05% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 114 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +6.98% | +11.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.75% | +15.96%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 10.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.5% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $12,858 | $14,265Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 28.4% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 20, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 21, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.6 years).
EAFG vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.
EAFG vs VYM Performance
Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (EAFG) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EAFG returned +12.75% while VYM returned +15.96%. Year to date, EAFG is up 6.98% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EAFG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 10.7% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.5% for EAFG and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EAFG charges 0.65% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $4 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EAFG currently yields 2.05% against 2.37% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
1.6% of EAFG's money is in holdings VYM also owns.
EAFG and VYM share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in EAFG and 602 in VYM, against full books of 114 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 573 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for EAFG (97.9% of the fund), and 2 for EAFG that do not appear in VYM (1.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EAFG | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TIGO:LUMillicom International Cellular Sa Common Stock | 1.61% | 0.03% | 1.58% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EAFG and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EAFG or VYM?
EAFG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EAFG or VYM?
Over the past year EAFG returned +12.75% vs +15.96% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EAFG or VYM?
EAFG has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 10.7% for VYM. Worst drawdown: EAFG -16.5% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both EAFG and VYM?
EAFG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EAFG and VYM?
1.6% of EAFG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.0% of VYM's is in holdings EAFG also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in EAFG and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, EAFG or VYM?
EAFG yields 2.05% while VYM yields 2.37%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than EAFG?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 28.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.