EALT vs UFEB
Innovator US Equity 5 to 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly vs Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February
Which is better, EALT or UFEB?
UFEB has been ahead.
EALT has a lower expense ratio. UFEB led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EALT | UFEB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $189M | $171M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 23 | 18 |
| YTD Return | +3.94% | +8.01%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.78% | +11.42%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.25% | +12.51%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.50% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.7% | 5.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8% | -8.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $14,322 | $14,395Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Oct 2, 2023 | Jan 31, 2020 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 2, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3 years).
EALT vs UFEB growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
EALT vs UFEB Performance
Innovator US Equity 5 to 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February (UFEB) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year EALT returned +6.78% while UFEB returned +11.42%. Year to date, EALT is up 3.94% versus a gain of 8.01% for UFEB.
Over three years, EALT compounded at +12.25% per year against +12.51% for UFEB.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EALT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 8.7% compared with 5.9% for UFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for EALT and -8.7% for UFEB. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EALT charges 0.69% per year while UFEB charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $79 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EALT currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for UFEB.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EALT and UFEB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EALT or UFEB?
EALT has an expense ratio of 0.69% while UFEB charges 0.79%. EALT is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EALT or UFEB?
Over the past year EALT returned +6.78% vs +11.42% for UFEB, so UFEB leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EALT or UFEB?
EALT has been the more volatile fund at 8.7% annualized versus 5.9% for UFEB. Worst drawdown: EALT -14.8% vs UFEB -8.7%.
Should I hold both EALT and UFEB?
EALT and UFEB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EALT or UFEB?
EALT yields 0.00% while UFEB yields 0.00%, so UFEB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is UFEB better than EALT?
EALT has a lower expense ratio. UFEB led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.