EASG vs PJIN
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF vs PGIM Jennison International Core Equity ETF
Which is better, EASG or PJIN?
EASG costs less.
EASG has a lower expense ratio. EASG is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EASG | PJIN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.14%Best | 0.23% |
| AUM | $68M | $5M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.75% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 361 | 110 |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.5%Best | 25.7% |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 5, 2018 | Sep 1, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 33 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. EASG has data through Sep 11, 2026 and PJIN through Oct 14, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EASG charges 0.14% per year while PJIN charges 0.23%. On a $10,000 position that is $14 vs $23 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EASG currently yields 3.75% against 0.00% for PJIN.
Holdings Overlap
22.0% of EASG's money is in holdings PJIN also owns. 29.0% of PJIN's money is in holdings EASG also owns.
PJIN and EASG share little of their money.
36 positions in common, counted across the 356 positions we hold weights for in EASG and 110 in PJIN, against full books of 361 and 110.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 9 positions for PJIN that do not appear in our book for EASG (10.9% of the fund), and 2 for EASG that do not appear in PJIN (1.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EASG | Weight in PJIN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AZN:LNAstraZeneca PLC | 2.10% | 1.50% | 0.60% |
| AXAF:PAAXA S.A. | 0.69% | 2.73% | 2.04% |
| ZURN:SMZurich Insurance Group. Namen Akt | 0.93% | 2.19% | 1.26% |
| SCHN:PASchneider Electric Se | 1.64% | 0.86% | 0.78% |
| ABBN:SMAbb Ltd | 1.32% | 0.99% | 0.33% |
| CPG:LNCompass Group Plc | 0.45% | 1.76% | 1.31% |
| 6098:JPRecruit Holdings Co. Ltd. Com Stk | 1.30% | 0.90% | 0.40% |
| 6758:JPSony Corp | 1.27% | 0.91% | 0.36% |
| 6504:JPFuji Electric Co Ltd | 0.09% | 1.85% | 1.76% |
| 8035:JPTokyo Electron Ltd. Com Stk | 1.35% | 0.56% | 0.79% |
29.0% of PJIN is already inside EASG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EASG or PJIN?
EASG has an expense ratio of 0.14% while PJIN charges 0.23%. EASG is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between EASG and PJIN?
29.0% of PJIN's money is in holdings EASG also owns. 29.0% of PJIN's is in holdings EASG also owns. They hold 36 positions in common, counted across the 356 positions we hold weights for in EASG and 110 in PJIN.
Which pays a higher dividend, EASG or PJIN?
EASG yields 3.75% while PJIN yields 0.00%, so EASG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PJIN better than EASG?
EASG has a lower expense ratio. EASG is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.