EATZ vs PSFJ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF vs Pacer Swan SOS Flex July ETF
Which is better, EATZ or PSFJ?
PSFJ has been ahead.
PSFJ has a lower expense ratio. PSFJ led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EATZ | PSFJ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $58M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.48% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 22 | 13 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 9.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -31.3% | -12.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $11,401 | $16,667Best |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Pacer ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | All Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 20, 2021 | Jun 30, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 167 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. EATZ has data through Apr 30, 2026 and PSFJ through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2021 to Apr 30, 2026 (4.8 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EATZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 9.8% for PSFJ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.3% for EATZ and -12.2% for PSFJ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EATZ charges 1.00% per year while PSFJ charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $49 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EATZ currently yields 0.48% against 0.00% for PSFJ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EATZ and PSFJ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EATZ or PSFJ?
EATZ has an expense ratio of 1.00% while PSFJ charges 0.49%. PSFJ is the cheaper option, by $51 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, EATZ or PSFJ?
EATZ has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 9.8% for PSFJ. Worst drawdown: EATZ -31.3% vs PSFJ -12.2%.
Should I hold both EATZ and PSFJ?
EATZ and PSFJ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EATZ or PSFJ?
EATZ yields 0.48% while PSFJ yields 0.00%, so EATZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PSFJ better than EATZ?
PSFJ has a lower expense ratio. PSFJ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.