ECML vs FDIV
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF vs MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF
Which is better, ECML or FDIV?
ECML has been ahead.
FDIV has a lower expense ratio. ECML led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ECML is less concentrated, with 20.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ECML | FDIV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.35%Best |
| AUM | $126M | $53M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% | 2.61% |
| Holdings | 130 | 224 |
| YTD Return | +18.99%Best | -0.05% |
| 1Y Return | +24.66%Best | +2.12% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.57%Best | +6.26% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.0% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -18.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $14,897Best | $11,722 |
| Top 10 Weight | 20.7%Best | 33.0% |
| Fund Family | Euclidean Technologies | MarketDesk Indices |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 18, 2023 | Sep 19, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 20, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).
ECML vs FDIV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
ECML vs FDIV Performance
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is an ETF from Euclidean Technologies and MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF (FDIV) is an ETF from MarketDesk Indices. Over the past year ECML returned +24.66% while FDIV returned +2.12%. Year to date, ECML is up 18.99% versus a loss of 0.05% for FDIV.
Over three years, ECML compounded at +14.57% per year against +6.26% for FDIV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ECML has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 12.8% for FDIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for ECML and -18.6% for FDIV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ECML charges 0.95% per year while FDIV charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $35 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ECML currently yields 1.17% against 2.61% for FDIV.
Holdings Overlap
8.2% of ECML's money is in holdings FDIV also owns. 4.4% of FDIV's money is in holdings ECML also owns.
ECML and FDIV share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in ECML and 111 in FDIV, against full books of 130 and 224.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 101 positions for FDIV that do not appear in our book for ECML (93.5% of the fund), and 58 for ECML that do not appear in FDIV (90.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ECML and FDIV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ECML or FDIV?
ECML has an expense ratio of 0.95% while FDIV charges 0.35%. FDIV is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ECML or FDIV?
Over the past year ECML returned +24.66% vs +2.12% for FDIV, so ECML leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ECML or FDIV?
ECML has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 12.8% for FDIV. Worst drawdown: ECML -25.4% vs FDIV -18.6%.
Should I hold both ECML and FDIV?
ECML and FDIV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ECML and FDIV?
8.2% of ECML's money is in holdings FDIV also owns. 4.4% of FDIV's is in holdings ECML also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in ECML and 111 in FDIV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ECML or FDIV?
ECML yields 1.17% while FDIV yields 2.61%, so FDIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FDIV better than ECML?
FDIV has a lower expense ratio. ECML led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ECML is less concentrated, with 20.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.