ECML vs FFLC
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
Which is better, ECML or FFLC?
Each has led over a different period.
FFLC has a lower expense ratio. ECML led over 1Y, FFLC over 3Y and the full window. ECML is less concentrated, with 20.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ECML | FFLC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.38%Best |
| AUM | $126M | $1.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% | 1.01% |
| Holdings | 130 | 216 |
| YTD Return | +18.99%Best | +9.90% |
| 1Y Return | +24.66%Best | +14.13% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.57% | +22.06%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.97% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 13.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -19.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $16,212 | $19,071Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 20.7%Best | 41.9% |
| Fund Family | Euclidean Technologies | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 18, 2023 | Jun 2, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 18, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.4 years).
ECML vs FFLC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.
ECML vs FFLC Performance
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is an ETF from Euclidean Technologies and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Over the past year ECML returned +24.66% while FFLC returned +14.13%. Year to date, ECML is up 18.99% versus a gain of 9.90% for FFLC.
Over three years, ECML compounded at +14.57% per year against +22.06% for FFLC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ECML has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 13.5% for FFLC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for ECML and -19.7% for FFLC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ECML charges 0.95% per year while FFLC charges 0.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $38 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ECML currently yields 1.17% against 1.01% for FFLC.
Holdings Overlap
7.8% of ECML's money is in holdings FFLC also owns. 2.0% of FFLC's money is in holdings ECML also owns.
ECML and FFLC share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in ECML and 108 in FFLC, against full books of 130 and 216.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 91 positions for FFLC that do not appear in our book for ECML (89.7% of the fund), and 58 for ECML that do not appear in FFLC (90.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ECML and FFLC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ECML or FFLC?
ECML has an expense ratio of 0.95% while FFLC charges 0.38%. FFLC is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ECML or FFLC?
Over the past year ECML returned +24.66% vs +14.13% for FFLC, so ECML leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ECML or FFLC?
ECML has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 13.5% for FFLC. Worst drawdown: ECML -25.4% vs FFLC -19.7%.
Should I hold both ECML and FFLC?
ECML and FFLC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ECML and FFLC?
7.8% of ECML's money is in holdings FFLC also owns. 2.0% of FFLC's is in holdings ECML also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in ECML and 108 in FFLC.
Which pays a higher dividend, ECML or FFLC?
ECML yields 1.17% while FFLC yields 1.01%, so ECML currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FFLC better than ECML?
FFLC has a lower expense ratio. ECML led over 1Y, FFLC over 3Y and the full window. ECML is less concentrated, with 20.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.