ECML vs GEND
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF vs Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF
Which is better, ECML or GEND?
Each has led over a different period.
GEND has a lower expense ratio. ECML led over 1Y, GEND over the full window. ECML is less concentrated, with 20.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ECML | GEND |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.38%Best |
| AUM | $126M | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% | 3.06% |
| Holdings | 130 | 33 |
| YTD Return | +18.99%Best | +15.57% |
| 1Y Return | +24.66%Best | +19.77% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.57% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.4% | 10.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1% | -13.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $12,577 | $13,510Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 20.7%Best | 40.3% |
| Fund Family | Euclidean Technologies | Genter Capital Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 18, 2023 | Dec 31, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 13, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.7 years).
ECML vs GEND growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
ECML vs GEND Performance
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is an ETF from Euclidean Technologies and Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) is an ETF from Genter Capital Management. Over the past year ECML returned +24.66% while GEND returned +19.77%. Year to date, ECML is up 18.99% versus a gain of 15.57% for GEND.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ECML has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.4% compared with 10.8% for GEND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for ECML and -13.3% for GEND. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ECML charges 0.95% per year while GEND charges 0.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $38 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ECML currently yields 1.17% against 3.06% for GEND.
Holdings Overlap
3.1% of ECML's money is in holdings GEND also owns. 6.1% of GEND's money is in holdings ECML also owns.
GEND and ECML share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in ECML and 35 in GEND, against full books of 130 and 33.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 30 positions for GEND that do not appear in our book for ECML (84.6% of the fund), and 61 for ECML that do not appear in GEND (95.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ECML and GEND you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ECML or GEND?
ECML has an expense ratio of 0.95% while GEND charges 0.38%. GEND is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ECML or GEND?
Over the past year ECML returned +24.66% vs +19.77% for GEND, so ECML leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ECML annualized +14.44% vs +19.36% for GEND. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ECML or GEND?
ECML has been the more volatile fund at 13.4% annualized versus 10.8% for GEND. Worst drawdown: ECML -19.1% vs GEND -13.3%.
Should I hold both ECML and GEND?
ECML and GEND have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ECML and GEND?
6.1% of GEND's money is in holdings ECML also owns. 6.1% of GEND's is in holdings ECML also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in ECML and 35 in GEND.
Which pays a higher dividend, ECML or GEND?
ECML yields 1.17% while GEND yields 3.06%, so GEND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GEND better than ECML?
GEND has a lower expense ratio. ECML led over 1Y, GEND over the full window. ECML is less concentrated, with 20.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.