ECML vs LSVD
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF vs LSV Disciplined Value ETF
Which is better, ECML or LSVD?
LSVD has been ahead.
LSVD has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. ECML is less concentrated, with 20.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ECML | LSVD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.40%Best |
| AUM | $126M | $678M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% | 0.27% |
| Holdings | 130 | 136 |
| YTD Return | +18.99% | +20.92%Best |
| 1Y Return | +24.66% | +30.07%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.57% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3%Tie | 13.3%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $12,658 | $14,810Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 20.7%Best | 35.0% |
| Fund Family | Euclidean Technologies | LSV Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 18, 2023 | Dec 17, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
ECML vs LSVD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
ECML vs LSVD Performance
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is an ETF from Euclidean Technologies and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) is an ETF from LSV Asset Management. Over the past year ECML returned +24.66% while LSVD returned +30.07%. Year to date, ECML is up 18.99% versus a gain of 20.92% for LSVD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ECML and LSVD have been equally volatile, both at 13.3% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for ECML and -19.3% for LSVD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ECML charges 0.95% per year while LSVD charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $40 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ECML currently yields 1.17% against 0.27% for LSVD.
Holdings Overlap
22.2% of ECML's money is in holdings LSVD also owns. 6.7% of LSVD's money is in holdings ECML also owns.
ECML and LSVD share little of their money.
13 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in ECML and 135 in LSVD, against full books of 130 and 136.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 120 positions for LSVD that do not appear in our book for ECML (92.9% of the fund), and 50 for ECML that do not appear in LSVD (76.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ECML | Weight in LSVD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 1.97% | 1.05% | 0.92% |
| FOXAFox Corp. Class A | 2.07% | 0.51% | 1.56% |
| BWABorgWarner Inc | 1.89% | 0.67% | 1.22% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 1.89% | 0.62% | 1.27% |
| OSKOshkosh Corp. | 1.84% | 0.42% | 1.42% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 1.62% | 0.63% | 0.99% |
| HRMYHarmony Biosciences, Llc | 1.74% | 0.37% | 1.37% |
| GTXGarrett Motion Inc | 1.70% | 0.36% | 1.34% |
| ELVElevance Health Inc | 1.59% | 0.42% | 1.17% |
| OCOwens Corning | 1.63% | 0.32% | 1.31% |
22.2% of ECML is already inside LSVD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ECML or LSVD?
ECML has an expense ratio of 0.95% while LSVD charges 0.40%. LSVD is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ECML or LSVD?
Over the past year ECML returned +24.66% vs +30.07% for LSVD, so LSVD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ECML annualized +13.99% vs +24.38% for LSVD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ECML or LSVD?
ECML and LSVD have been equally volatile, both at 13.3% annualized. Worst drawdown: ECML -19.1% vs LSVD -19.3%.
Should I hold both ECML and LSVD?
ECML and LSVD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ECML and LSVD?
22.2% of ECML's money is in holdings LSVD also owns. 6.7% of LSVD's is in holdings ECML also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in ECML and 135 in LSVD.
Which pays a higher dividend, ECML or LSVD?
ECML yields 1.17% while LSVD yields 0.27%, so ECML currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LSVD better than ECML?
LSVD has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. ECML is less concentrated, with 20.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.