ECML vs PSIL
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF vs ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF
Which is better, ECML or PSIL?
ECML has been ahead.
ECML has a lower expense ratio. ECML led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ECML is less concentrated, with 20.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ECML | PSIL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95%Best | 1.00% |
| AUM | $126M | $44M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% | 7.45% |
| Holdings | 130 | 33 |
| YTD Return | +18.99%Best | +16.80% |
| 1Y Return | +24.66%Best | +9.75% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.57%Best | +14.39% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -23.59% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8%Best | 45.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4%Best | -64.6% |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $16,212Best | $12,861 |
| Top 10 Weight | 20.7%Best | 64.2% |
| Fund Family | Euclidean Technologies | Advisor Shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 18, 2023 | Sep 15, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 18, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.4 years).
ECML vs PSIL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.
ECML vs PSIL Performance
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is an ETF from Euclidean Technologies and ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF (PSIL) is an ETF from Advisor Shares. Over the past year ECML returned +24.66% while PSIL returned +9.75%. Year to date, ECML is up 18.99% versus a gain of 16.80% for PSIL.
Over three years, ECML compounded at +14.57% per year against +14.39% for PSIL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 45.7% compared with 18.8% for ECML. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for ECML and -64.6% for PSIL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ECML charges 0.95% per year while PSIL charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $100 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ECML currently yields 1.17% against 7.45% for PSIL.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 64 holdings in ECML and 29 in PSIL, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in ECML and 29 in PSIL, against full books of 130 and 33.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 19 positions for PSIL that do not appear in our book for ECML (62.6% of the fund), and 63 for ECML that do not appear in PSIL (98.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ECML and PSIL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ECML or PSIL?
ECML has an expense ratio of 0.95% while PSIL charges 1.00%. ECML is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ECML or PSIL?
Over the past year ECML returned +24.66% vs +9.75% for PSIL, so ECML leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ECML or PSIL?
PSIL has been the more volatile fund at 45.7% annualized versus 18.8% for ECML. Worst drawdown: ECML -25.4% vs PSIL -64.6%.
Should I hold both ECML and PSIL?
ECML and PSIL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ECML or PSIL?
ECML yields 1.17% while PSIL yields 7.45%, so PSIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PSIL better than ECML?
ECML has a lower expense ratio. ECML led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ECML is less concentrated, with 20.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.