ECML vs XLF
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF vs State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
Which is better, ECML or XLF?
Each has led over a different period.
XLF has a lower expense ratio. ECML led over 1Y, XLF over 3Y and the full window. ECML is less concentrated, with 20.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ECML | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.08%Best |
| AUM | $126M | $51.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% | 1.40% |
| Holdings | 130 | 160 |
| YTD Return | +18.99%Best | +0.47% |
| 1Y Return | +24.66%Best | +4.02% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.57% | +19.43%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.82% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -15.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $16,212 | $17,575Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 20.7%Best | 57.3% |
| Fund Family | Euclidean Technologies | SPDR State Street Global Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 18, 2023 | Dec 16, 1998 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 18, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.4 years).
ECML vs XLF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.
ECML vs XLF Performance
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is an ETF from Euclidean Technologies and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year ECML returned +24.66% while XLF returned +4.02%. Year to date, ECML is up 18.99% versus a gain of 0.47% for XLF.
Over three years, ECML compounded at +14.57% per year against +19.43% for XLF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ECML has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 14.8% for XLF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for ECML and -15.5% for XLF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ECML charges 0.95% per year while XLF charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $8 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ECML currently yields 1.17% against 1.40% for XLF.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 64 holdings in ECML and 77 in XLF, totalling 100.0% and 99.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in ECML and 77 in XLF, against full books of 130 and 160.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 76 positions for XLF that do not appear in our book for ECML (99.5% of the fund), and 63 for ECML that do not appear in XLF (98.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ECML and XLF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ECML or XLF?
ECML has an expense ratio of 0.95% while XLF charges 0.08%. XLF is the cheaper option, by $87 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ECML or XLF?
Over the past year ECML returned +24.66% vs +4.02% for XLF, so ECML leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ECML or XLF?
ECML has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 14.8% for XLF. Worst drawdown: ECML -25.4% vs XLF -15.5%.
Should I hold both ECML and XLF?
ECML and XLF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ECML or XLF?
ECML yields 1.17% while XLF yields 1.40%, so XLF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XLF better than ECML?
XLF has a lower expense ratio. ECML led over 1Y, XLF over 3Y and the full window. ECML is less concentrated, with 20.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.