EDGQ vs NBFR
Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF vs Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF
Which is better, EDGQ or NBFR?
EDGQ costs less.
EDGQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDGQ | NBFR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $12M | $20M |
| Dividend Yield | 7.69% | 0.02% |
| Holdings | 10 | 106 |
| YTD Return | +17.86%Best | +5.93% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Feb 17, 2026 | Feb 24, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
EDGQ vs NBFR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EDGQ vs NBFR Performance
Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF (NBFR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Year to date, EDGQ is up 17.86% versus a gain of 5.93% for NBFR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDGQ charges 0.00% per year while NBFR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $79 annually, a gap of $79 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDGQ currently yields 7.69% against 0.02% for NBFR.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in EDGQ and 44 in NBFR, totalling 97.7% and 97.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in EDGQ and 44 in NBFR, against full books of 10 and 106.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EDGQ and NBFR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDGQ or NBFR?
EDGQ has an expense ratio of 0.00% while NBFR charges 0.79%. EDGQ is the cheaper option, by $79 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDGQ or NBFR?
EDGQ yields 7.69% while NBFR yields 0.02%, so EDGQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NBFR better than EDGQ?
EDGQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.