EDGQ vs PBQQ
Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF vs PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF
Which is better, EDGQ or PBQQ?
EDGQ costs less.
EDGQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDGQ | PBQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $12M | $98M |
| Dividend Yield | 7.69% | 0.01% |
| Holdings | 10 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +17.86%Best | +12.12% |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.38% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Feb 17, 2026 | Dec 27, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
EDGQ vs PBQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EDGQ vs PBQQ Performance
Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Year to date, EDGQ is up 17.86% versus a gain of 12.12% for PBQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDGQ charges 0.00% per year while PBQQ charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $50 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDGQ currently yields 7.69% against 0.01% for PBQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in EDGQ and 4 in PBQQ, totalling 97.7% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in EDGQ and 4 in PBQQ, against full books of 10 and 12.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EDGQ and PBQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDGQ or PBQQ?
EDGQ has an expense ratio of 0.00% while PBQQ charges 0.50%. EDGQ is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDGQ or PBQQ?
EDGQ yields 7.69% while PBQQ yields 0.01%, so EDGQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PBQQ better than EDGQ?
EDGQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.