EDGU vs HRTS
3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF vs Tema Heart & Health ETF
Which is better, EDGU or HRTS?
EDGU has been ahead.
HRTS has a lower expense ratio. EDGU led over the full window. HRTS is less concentrated, with 48.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 94.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDGU | HRTS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.91% | 0.75%Best |
| AUM | $101M | $53M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 1.30% |
| Holdings | 30 | 92 |
| YTD Return | +11.37%Best | +2.75% |
| 1Y Return | +14.59%Tie | +14.59%Tie |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.00% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3%Best | 15.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.6%Best | -21.5% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $12,796Best | $11,428 |
| Top 10 Weight | 94.6% | 48.3%Best |
| Fund Family | 3 EDGE Asset Management | Tema Global Limited |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 3, 2024 | Nov 20, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 3, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
EDGU vs HRTS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
EDGU vs HRTS Performance
3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF (EDGU) is an ETF from 3 EDGE Asset Management and Tema Heart & Health ETF (HRTS) is an ETF from Tema Global Limited. Over the past year EDGU returned +14.59% while HRTS returned +14.59%. Year to date, EDGU is up 11.37% versus a gain of 2.75% for HRTS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HRTS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 12.3% for EDGU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.6% for EDGU and -21.5% for HRTS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDGU charges 0.91% per year while HRTS charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $91 vs $75 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDGU currently yields 0.69% against 1.30% for HRTS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 14 holdings in EDGU and 46 in HRTS, totalling 100.0% and 100.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 14 positions we hold weights for in EDGU and 46 in HRTS, against full books of 30 and 92.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 38 positions for HRTS that do not appear in our book for EDGU (82.8% of the fund), and 14 for EDGU that do not appear in HRTS (100.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EDGU and HRTS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDGU or HRTS?
EDGU has an expense ratio of 0.91% while HRTS charges 0.75%. HRTS is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EDGU or HRTS?
Over the past year EDGU returned +14.59% vs +14.59% for HRTS, so HRTS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EDGU annualized +13.12% vs +6.90% for HRTS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EDGU or HRTS?
HRTS has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 12.3% for EDGU. Worst drawdown: EDGU -17.6% vs HRTS -21.5%.
Should I hold both EDGU and HRTS?
EDGU and HRTS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDGU or HRTS?
EDGU yields 0.69% while HRTS yields 1.30%, so HRTS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HRTS better than EDGU?
HRTS has a lower expense ratio. EDGU led over the full window. HRTS is less concentrated, with 48.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 94.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.