EEM vs EMC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF
Which is better, EEM or EMC?
Nearly the same fund. EMC costs less.
EMC has a lower expense ratio. EEM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EEM | EMC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.65%Best |
| AUM | $30.4B | $56M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.67% | 0.56% |
| Holdings | 1,224 | 80 |
| YTD Return | +15.09%Best | +12.58% |
| 1Y Return | +23.94%Best | +16.43% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.98%Best | +15.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.13% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -17.3%Best | -18.4% |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $17,702Best | $14,563 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2003 | Sep 24, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 15, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.4 years).
EEM vs EMC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.
EEM vs EMC Performance
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year EEM returned +23.94% while EMC returned +16.43%. Year to date, EEM is up 15.09% versus a gain of 12.58% for EMC.
Over three years, EEM compounded at +21.98% per year against +15.48% for EMC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 15.4% for EMC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.3% for EEM and -18.4% for EMC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EEM charges 0.72% per year while EMC charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $65 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EEM currently yields 1.67% against 0.56% for EMC.
Holdings Overlap
At least 34.7% of EEM's money is in holdings EMC also owns.
Stated as a floor: for EMC, our book for it covers 85.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
39 positions in common, counted across the 1,162 positions we hold weights for in EEM and 67 in EMC, against full books of 1,224 and 80.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EEM | Weight in EMC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 15.69% | 2.20% | 13.49% |
| 000660:KRSk Hynix Inc Common Stock KRW 5000 | 6.03% | 4.29% | 1.74% |
| 2454:TWMediaTek Inc ORD TWD10 | 1.82% | 4.57% | 2.75% |
| 0700:HKTencent Holdings, Ltd. | 2.73% | 3.46% | 0.73% |
| 2308:TWDelta Electronics Inc | 0.94% | 2.76% | 1.82% |
| 402340:KRSk Square | 0.64% | 2.21% | 1.57% |
| 2317:TWHon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd Ord Twd10 | 0.79% | 2.02% | 1.23% |
| 055550:KRShinhan Financial Group Co Ltd | 0.26% | 2.36% | 2.10% |
| HDFCBANK:MBHdfc Bank Limited | 0.69% | 1.33% | 0.64% |
| 12450:KRHanwha Aerospace Co Ltd | 0.21% | 1.63% | 1.42% |
34.7% of EEM is already inside EMC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EEM or EMC?
EEM has an expense ratio of 0.72% while EMC charges 0.65%. EMC is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EEM or EMC?
Over the past year EEM returned +23.94% vs +16.43% for EMC, so EEM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EEM or EMC?
EEM has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 15.4% for EMC. Worst drawdown: EEM -17.3% vs EMC -18.4%.
Should I hold both EEM and EMC?
EEM and EMC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EEM and EMC?
At least 34.7% of EEM's money is in holdings EMC also owns. Our book for EMC is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 1,162 positions we hold weights for in EEM and 67 in EMC.
Which pays a higher dividend, EEM or EMC?
EEM yields 1.67% while EMC yields 0.56%, so EEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is EMC better than EEM?
EMC has a lower expense ratio. EEM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.