EGGQ vs VTI
NestYield Visionary ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EGGQ or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EGGQ led over the full window, VTI over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EGGQ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $89M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.57% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 45 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +18.23%Best | +14.35% |
| 1Y Return | +10.26% | +17.97%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.47% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.62% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 34.7% | 12.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.6% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $14,696Best | $13,417 |
| Top 10 Weight | 64.2% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | NestYield | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 26, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 30, 2024 to Oct 13, 2026 (1.8 years).
EGGQ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
EGGQ vs VTI Performance
NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) is an ETF from NestYield and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EGGQ returned +10.26% while VTI returned +17.97%. Year to date, EGGQ is up 18.23% versus a gain of 14.35% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EGGQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.7% compared with 12.5% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.6% for EGGQ and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EGGQ charges 0.93% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $3 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EGGQ currently yields 8.57% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
80.2% of EGGQ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 8.5% of VTI's money is in holdings EGGQ also owns.
Most of EGGQ is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 47 days apart, EGGQ as of Sep 16, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
18 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in EGGQ and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 45 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,133 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for EGGQ (89.0% of the fund), and 3 for EGGQ that do not appear in VTI (14.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EGGQ | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| STXSeagate Technolo | 10.74% | 0.27% | 10.47% |
| BECfd Bloom Energy Corp- A | 9.75% | 0.08% | 9.67% |
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 9.33% | 0.08% | 9.25% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 4.23% | 2.90% | 1.33% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp. | 6.01% | 0.26% | 5.75% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.33% | 1.08% | 3.25% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.84% | 1.29% | 2.55% |
| VRTVertiv Co. | 4.14% | 0.13% | 4.01% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 3.72% | 0.25% | 3.47% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.46% | 1.35% | 1.11% |
80.2% of EGGQ is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EGGQ or VTI?
EGGQ has an expense ratio of 0.93% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $90 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EGGQ or VTI?
Over the past year EGGQ returned +10.26% vs +17.97% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EGGQ annualized +23.85% vs +17.74% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EGGQ or VTI?
EGGQ has been the more volatile fund at 34.7% annualized versus 12.5% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EGGQ -33.6% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both EGGQ and VTI?
EGGQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EGGQ and VTI?
80.2% of EGGQ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 8.5% of VTI's is in holdings EGGQ also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in EGGQ and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, EGGQ or VTI?
EGGQ yields 8.57% while VTI yields 1.03%, so EGGQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EGGQ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EGGQ led over the full window, VTI over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.