EGLE vs QQQ
Global X S&P 500 US Revenue Leaders ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, EGLE or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. EGLE is less concentrated, with 43.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EGLE | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.13% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 754 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +11.65% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.43% | +22.47%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.0%Best | 19.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.8%Best | -12.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $13,376 | $16,554Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.2%Best | 46.7% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Apr 15, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 16, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.5 years).
EGLE vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
EGLE vs QQQ Performance
Global X S&P 500 US Revenue Leaders ETF (EGLE) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EGLE returned +12.43% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, EGLE is up 11.65% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.3% compared with 11.0% for EGLE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.8% for EGLE and -12.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EGLE charges 0.19% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $18 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EGLE currently yields 1.13% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
47.8% of EGLE's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 47.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings EGLE also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
51 positions in common, counted across the 367 positions we hold weights for in EGLE and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 754 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 42 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for EGLE (48.6% of the fund), and 314 for EGLE that do not appear in QQQ (51.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EGLE | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 10.95% | 8.33% | 2.62% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 11.70% | 5.76% | 5.94% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.60% | 4.07% | 1.53% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.68% | 5.02% | 1.34% |
| TSLATesla Motors Inc | 2.38% | 2.82% | 0.44% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.04% | 2.11% | 1.07% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.35% | 1.77% | 0.42% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 1.32% | 1.80% | 0.48% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc. | 1.00% | 1.35% | 0.35% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc. Class A | 0.84% | 1.13% | 0.29% |
47.8% of EGLE is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EGLE or QQQ?
EGLE has an expense ratio of 0.19% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EGLE or QQQ?
Over the past year EGLE returned +12.43% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EGLE annualized +21.40% vs +39.94% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EGLE or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.3% annualized versus 11.0% for EGLE. Worst drawdown: EGLE -9.8% vs QQQ -12.0%.
Should I hold both EGLE and QQQ?
EGLE and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EGLE and QQQ?
47.8% of EGLE's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 47.7% of QQQ's is in holdings EGLE also owns. They hold 51 positions in common, counted across the 367 positions we hold weights for in EGLE and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, EGLE or QQQ?
EGLE yields 1.13% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so EGLE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than EGLE?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. EGLE is less concentrated, with 43.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.