EMC vs EMMF
Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF vs WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund
Which is better, EMC or EMMF?
EMMF has been ahead.
EMMF has a lower expense ratio. EMMF led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMC | EMMF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.48%Best |
| AUM | $56M | $181M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.56% | 1.89% |
| Holdings | 80 | 245 |
| YTD Return | +12.58% | +15.74%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.43% | +23.28%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.48% | +18.89%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.94% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4% | 13.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4% | -16.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $14,563 | $17,702Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 24, 2010 | Aug 10, 2018 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 15, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.4 years).
EMC vs EMMF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.
EMC vs EMMF Performance
Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year EMC returned +16.43% while EMMF returned +23.28%. Year to date, EMC is up 12.58% versus a gain of 15.74% for EMMF.
Over three years, EMC compounded at +15.48% per year against +18.89% for EMMF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 13.6% for EMMF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for EMC and -16.0% for EMMF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMC charges 0.65% per year while EMMF charges 0.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $48 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMC currently yields 0.56% against 1.89% for EMMF.
Holdings Overlap
At least 13.3% of EMMF's money is in holdings EMC also owns.
Stated as a floor: for EMC, our book for it covers 85.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
EMMF and EMC share little of their money.
15 positions in common, counted across the 67 positions we hold weights for in EMC and 209 in EMMF, against full books of 80 and 245.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EMC | Weight in EMMF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 000660:KRSk Hynix Inc Common Stock KRW 5000 | 4.29% | 5.53% | 1.24% |
| 2454:TWMediaTek Inc ORD TWD10 | 4.57% | 1.19% | 3.38% |
| 2308:TWDelta Electronics Inc | 2.76% | 0.76% | 2.00% |
| 055550:KRShinhan Financial Group Co Ltd | 2.36% | 0.38% | 1.98% |
| MELIMercadolibre Inc | 0.49% | 1.81% | 1.32% |
| 0939:HKChina Construction Bank Corp Ord Hkd1 Cl H | 1.39% | 0.58% | 0.81% |
| 2382:TWQuanta Computer Inc | 1.28% | 0.36% | 0.92% |
| EICHERMOT:MBEicher Motors Ltd | 1.07% | 0.40% | 0.67% |
| 009150:KRSamsung Electro-Mechanics Co L | 0.93% | 0.50% | 0.43% |
| 9999:HKNetease Inc | 1.08% | 0.30% | 0.78% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMC and EMMF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMC or EMMF?
EMC has an expense ratio of 0.65% while EMMF charges 0.48%. EMMF is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMC or EMMF?
Over the past year EMC returned +16.43% vs +23.28% for EMMF, so EMMF leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMC or EMMF?
EMC has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 13.6% for EMMF. Worst drawdown: EMC -18.4% vs EMMF -16.0%.
Should I hold both EMC and EMMF?
EMC and EMMF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EMC and EMMF?
At least 13.3% of EMMF's money is in holdings EMC also owns. Our book for EMC is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 67 positions we hold weights for in EMC and 209 in EMMF.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMC or EMMF?
EMC yields 0.56% while EMMF yields 1.89%, so EMMF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is EMMF better than EMC?
EMMF has a lower expense ratio. EMMF led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.