EMC vs NSI
Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF vs National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF
Which is better, EMC or NSI?
NSI has been ahead.
EMC has a lower expense ratio. NSI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMC | NSI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $56M | $43M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.56% | 1.21% |
| Holdings | 80 | 204 |
| YTD Return | +12.58%Best | +8.60% |
| 1Y Return | +16.43% | +17.93%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.48% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 12.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4% | -16.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $15,138 | $16,304Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | National Security Index |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 24, 2010 | Dec 6, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 7, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
EMC vs NSI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
EMC vs NSI Performance
Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF (NSI) is an ETF from National Security Index. Over the past year EMC returned +16.43% while NSI returned +17.93%. Year to date, EMC is up 12.58% versus a gain of 8.60% for NSI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.9% for NSI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for EMC and -16.6% for NSI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMC charges 0.65% per year while NSI charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $75 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMC currently yields 0.56% against 1.21% for NSI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 39.5% of NSI's money is in holdings EMC also owns.
Stated as a floor: for EMC, our book for it covers 85.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
11 positions in common, counted across the 67 positions we hold weights for in EMC and 99 in NSI, against full books of 80 and 204.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EMC | Weight in NSI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 2.20% | 15.50% | 13.30% |
| 009150:KRSamsung Electro-Mechanics Co L | 0.93% | 10.07% | 9.14% |
| 2317:TWHon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd Ord Twd10 | 2.02% | 3.47% | 1.45% |
| IBN:MBIcici Bank Limited Sponsored Adr (1 Ads : 2 Ordinary) | 1.85% | 1.28% | 0.57% |
| 9999:HKNetease Inc | 1.08% | 1.99% | 0.91% |
| ITUBITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING SA ADR | 2.31% | 0.73% | 1.58% |
| PDD:IEPdd Holdings Inc. | 0.88% | 2.15% | 1.27% |
| RIGDL:LNReliance Inds Gdr | 0.89% | 2.12% | 1.23% |
| MELIMercadolibre Inc | 0.49% | 1.42% | 0.93% |
| NU:BVNu Holdings Ltd | 0.75% | 0.60% | 0.15% |
39.5% of NSI is already inside EMC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMC or NSI?
EMC has an expense ratio of 0.65% while NSI charges 0.75%. EMC is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMC or NSI?
Over the past year EMC returned +16.43% vs +17.93% for NSI, so NSI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMC or NSI?
EMC has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.9% for NSI. Worst drawdown: EMC -18.4% vs NSI -16.6%.
Should I hold both EMC and NSI?
EMC and NSI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EMC and NSI?
At least 39.5% of NSI's money is in holdings EMC also owns. Our book for EMC is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 67 positions we hold weights for in EMC and 99 in NSI.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMC or NSI?
EMC yields 0.56% while NSI yields 1.21%, so NSI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NSI better than EMC?
EMC has a lower expense ratio. NSI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.