EMC vs RWEM
Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF vs Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Which is better, EMC or RWEM?
RWEM has been ahead.
RWEM has a lower expense ratio. RWEM led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMC | RWEM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.52%Best |
| AUM | $56M | $71M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.56% | 1.77% |
| Holdings | 80 | 450 |
| YTD Return | +12.58% | +15.92%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.43% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.48% | - |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | The Advisors Inner Circle Fund |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 24, 2010 | Dec 15, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
EMC vs RWEM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EMC vs RWEM Performance
Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (RWEM) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund. Year to date, EMC is up 12.58% versus a gain of 15.92% for RWEM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMC charges 0.65% per year while RWEM charges 0.52%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $52 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMC currently yields 0.56% against 1.77% for RWEM.
Holdings Overlap
At least 21.3% of RWEM's money is in holdings EMC also owns.
Stated as a floor: for EMC, our book for it covers 85.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
RWEM and EMC share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 67 positions we hold weights for in EMC and 223 in RWEM, against full books of 80 and 450.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EMC | Weight in RWEM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 2.20% | 9.30% | 7.10% |
| 000660:KRSk Hynix Inc Common Stock KRW 5000 | 4.29% | 4.62% | 0.33% |
| 2454:TWMediaTek Inc ORD TWD10 | 4.57% | 2.57% | 2.00% |
| 2308:TWDelta Electronics Inc | 2.76% | 2.86% | 0.10% |
| 402340:KRSk Square | 2.21% | 1.01% | 1.20% |
| 5274:TWAspeed Technology Inc | 1.12% | 0.90% | 0.22% |
21.3% of RWEM is already inside EMC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMC or RWEM?
EMC has an expense ratio of 0.65% while RWEM charges 0.52%. RWEM is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between EMC and RWEM?
At least 21.3% of RWEM's money is in holdings EMC also owns. Our book for EMC is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 67 positions we hold weights for in EMC and 223 in RWEM.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMC or RWEM?
EMC yields 0.56% while RWEM yields 1.77%, so RWEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RWEM better than EMC?
RWEM has a lower expense ratio. RWEM led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.