EMKT vs IVV
Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EMKT or IVV?
EMKT has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EMKT led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMKT | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | - | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.45% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 430 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +17.67%Best | +13.59% |
| 1Y Return | +19.25%Best | +17.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.9% | 13.2%Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.0% | 38.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Lazard Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
EMKT vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EMKT vs IVV Performance
Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) is an ETF from Lazard Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EMKT returned +19.25% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, EMKT is up 17.67% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMKT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.9% compared with 13.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMKT charges 0.74% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $3 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMKT currently yields 0.45% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 213 holdings in EMKT and 506 in IVV, totalling 99.9% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 213 positions we hold weights for in EMKT and 506 in IVV, against full books of 430 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 500 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for EMKT (99.4% of the fund), and 2 for EMKT that do not appear in IVV (0.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMKT and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMKT or IVV?
EMKT has an expense ratio of 0.74% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMKT or IVV?
Over the past year EMKT returned +19.25% vs +17.54% for IVV, so EMKT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMKT or IVV?
EMKT has been the more volatile fund at 22.9% annualized versus 13.2% for IVV.
Should I hold both EMKT and IVV?
EMKT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMKT or IVV?
EMKT yields 0.45% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EMKT?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EMKT led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.