EMXF vs VTI
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EMXF or VTI?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EMXF led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window. EMXF is less concentrated, with 29.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMXF | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.16% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $169M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.69% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 587 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +18.05%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +26.66%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.67%Best | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.45% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.1% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,002 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.0%Best | 33.5% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 6, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 13, 2020 to Oct 14, 2026 (6 years).
EMXF vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6 years both funds cover.
EMXF vs VTI Performance
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMXF returned +26.66% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, EMXF is up 18.05% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, EMXF compounded at +22.67% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.45% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +14.71% annualized vs +10.42%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMXF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 15.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.1% for EMXF and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMXF charges 0.16% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $16 vs $3 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMXF currently yields 2.69% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 558 holdings in EMXF and 3,441 in VTI, totalling 100.2% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 558 positions we hold weights for in EMXF and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 587 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,156 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for EMXF (97.6% of the fund), and 7 for EMXF that do not appear in VTI (1.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMXF and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMXF or VTI?
EMXF has an expense ratio of 0.16% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMXF or VTI?
Over the past year EMXF returned +26.66% vs +16.63% for VTI, so EMXF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), EMXF annualized +10.42% vs +14.71% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMXF or VTI?
EMXF has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 15.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EMXF -33.1% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both EMXF and VTI?
EMXF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMXF or VTI?
EMXF yields 2.69% while VTI yields 1.06%, so EMXF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EMXF?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EMXF led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window. EMXF is less concentrated, with 29.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.